Un análisis abstracto del Derecho Penal del Enemigo a partir del Constitucionalismo Garantista y Dignatario
Cargando...
Fecha
2009
Profesor/a Guía
Facultad/escuela
Idioma
es
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad de Talca
Nombre de Curso
Licencia CC
Licencia CC
Resumen
El presente artículo describe, sin considerar casos particulares - y consultando preferentemente la obra de Günther Jakobs y algunos de sus comentaristas - las principales características del denominado Derecho Penal del Enemigo en abstracto. Ello con el propósito de evaluar su compatibilidad con el concepto de Dignidad Humana, presente en la mayoría de los ordenamientos constitucionales contemporáneos y en el sistema de protección de los Derechos Humanos. Se razona, aplicando el marco general propuesto por el neoconstitucionalismo teórico y el garantismo, especialmente aquella premisa que destaca la estructura estratificada de los sistemas jurídicos y en la cual la validez de las normas inferiores depende de su conformidad y adecuación a las superiores. El trabajo, intenta situarse dentro del no positivismo principialista en la Teoría del Derecho. Propone que en aquellos ordenamientos donde la noción de Dignidad Humana se incluya en la Carta Fundamental, normas tributarias del denominado Derecho Penal del Enemigo serían inconstitucionales. Se concluye reflexionando en torno a algunos rasgos de la formulación general del Derecho Penal del Enemigo que causarían tensiones irreconciliables con la noción de Dignidad Humana.
Abstract: The article describes, without considering particular cases - and preferably by consulting the work of Günther Jakobs and some of his commentators - the main features of theCriminal Law of the Enemy, abstractly. This, so as to evaluate their compatibility with the concept of Human Dignity, present in the majority of contemporary constitutional systems as well as in Human Rights protection systems. It is argued by applying the general statement, proposed by the theoretical neo constitutionalism, specially the principle that stresses the hierarchical structure of legal systems, in which the existence of a law depends of its compatibility and adequacy to higher laws. Through this work, we focus on the main non-positivism in the theory of law. It proposes that laws that recognize the Criminal Law of the Enemy, are unconstitutional if Human Dignity is included in the pertaining legal system's Constitution. It concludes reflecting about some features of Criminal Law of the Enemy, which cause irreconcilable issues with the concept of Human Dignity.
Abstract: The article describes, without considering particular cases - and preferably by consulting the work of Günther Jakobs and some of his commentators - the main features of theCriminal Law of the Enemy, abstractly. This, so as to evaluate their compatibility with the concept of Human Dignity, present in the majority of contemporary constitutional systems as well as in Human Rights protection systems. It is argued by applying the general statement, proposed by the theoretical neo constitutionalism, specially the principle that stresses the hierarchical structure of legal systems, in which the existence of a law depends of its compatibility and adequacy to higher laws. Through this work, we focus on the main non-positivism in the theory of law. It proposes that laws that recognize the Criminal Law of the Enemy, are unconstitutional if Human Dignity is included in the pertaining legal system's Constitution. It concludes reflecting about some features of Criminal Law of the Enemy, which cause irreconcilable issues with the concept of Human Dignity.
Notas
Indexación Scielo
Palabras clave
Derecho Penal del Enemigo, Dignidad Humana, Neoconstitucionalismo, Garantismo, Constitucionalismo Contemporáneo, Criminal Law of the Enemy, Human Dignity, Neo constitutionalism, Contemporary constitutionalism
Citación
Política criminal, vol. 4, N° 8, pp. 383-407, 2009.