Dualismo Socrático
Cargando...
Archivos
Fecha
2018-11
Autores
Profesor/a Guía
Facultad/escuela
Idioma
en
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad de Chile
Nombre de Curso
Licencia CC
Licencia CC
Resumen
The purpose of this article is to show, against the dominant interpretations, that earlier in his career Plato saw the need to postulate the survival of the soul as an independent locus of benefit and harm, in order to complete his defense of Socratic ethics - in particular, of the principle of Sovereignty of Virtue, crucial to earlier dialogues such as Apology, Crito, and Gorgias. The dualism resulting from this postulate I call 'socratic dualism', distinct from the mature dualism developed by Plato in the Phaedo. © 2018 Universidad de Chile. All rights reserved.
The purpose of this article is to show, against the dominant interpretations, that earlier in his career Plato saw the need to postulate the survival of the soul as an independent locus of benefit and harm, in order to complete his defense of Socratic ethics – in particular, of the principle of Sovereignty of Virtue, crucial to earlier dialogues such as Apology, Crito, and Gorgias. The dualism resulting from this postulate I call ‘socratic dualism’, distinct from the mature dualism developed by Plato in the Phaedo.
The purpose of this article is to show, against the dominant interpretations, that earlier in his career Plato saw the need to postulate the survival of the soul as an independent locus of benefit and harm, in order to complete his defense of Socratic ethics – in particular, of the principle of Sovereignty of Virtue, crucial to earlier dialogues such as Apology, Crito, and Gorgias. The dualism resulting from this postulate I call ‘socratic dualism’, distinct from the mature dualism developed by Plato in the Phaedo.
Notas
Inexación: Scopus.
Palabras clave
Benefit, Body, Dualism, Ethics, Harm, Socrates, SoulSurvivalVirtue, Survival, Virtue
Citación
Revista de Filosofia (Chile), 74, pp. 55-72.