Criterios de evaluaciĆ³n en estudios de longevidad de restauraciones de resina compuesta : un Scoping Review
Cargando...
Archivos
Fecha
2020
Profesor/a GuĆa
Facultad/escuela
Idioma
es
TĆtulo de la revista
ISSN de la revista
TĆtulo del volumen
Editor
Universidad AndrƩs Bello
Nombre de Curso
Licencia CC
Licencia CC
Resumen
A lo largo de la historia odontolĆ³gica los criterios de evaluaciĆ³n de
restauraciones y sus modificaciones fueron tomando un rol esencial en el diagnĆ³stico,
control y manejo de restauraciones de resina compuesta, permitiendo en su conjunto
una mayor longevidad de las mismas. Esta revisiĆ³n tuvo como objetivo identificar, con
un enfoque sistemĆ”tico, los criterios de evaluaciĆ³n utilizados en estudios de longevidad
desde el aƱo 2015 hasta la fecha, analizar los criterios identificados junto con sus
utilidades prĆ”cticas, comparar sus categorĆas y grados segĆŗn sus respectivas
referencias.
Materiales y mĆ©todos: Esta bĆŗsqueda sistemĆ”tica siguiĆ³ la declaraciĆ³n PRISMA,
utilizando las palabras claves āLongevity - Composite restoration - Criteriaā en bases de
datos EBSCO, SCOPUS Y SCIELO; Utilizando los siguientes criterios de inclusiĆ³n:
Estudios que evalĆŗan longevidad publicados desde el aƱo 2015 a la fecha, abstract
incluido, texto completo y manualmente incluidos.
Resultados: 39 estudios clĆnicos fueron seleccionados para realizar la recopilaciĆ³n de
datos. Del total de estudios un 66,6% utilizĆ³ alguna modificaciĆ³n del criterio USPHS, un
17,9 utilizĆ³ el criterio FDI, 7,3% utilizaron ambos y un 7,3% utilizĆ³ un criterio propio. La
categorĆa mĆ”s utilizada del criterio USPHS fue adaptaciĆ³n marginal y el sistema de
graduaciĆ³n mĆ”s utilizado fue la fonĆ©tica A-B-C-D. 84% de los examinadores realizaron
calibraciĆ³n, pero solo un 64% mencionĆ³ el porcentaje de concordancia que obtuvieron.
ConclusiĆ³n: El uso de criterios de evaluaciĆ³n son una herramienta importante tanto en
el Ć”mbito clĆnico, como cientĆfico, siendo el criterio USPHS modificado el mĆ”s utilizado,
empleando la mayorĆa de categorĆas y grados propios de este, sin embargo la
calibraciĆ³n de los examinadores no fue descrita en el global de los estudios analizados.
Se hace sugerente una actualizaciĆ³n de los criterios ya propuestos y la consiguiente
elaboraciĆ³n de un Ćŗnico criterio universal estandarizado.
Throughout dental history, the evaluation criteria for restorations and their modifications have taken an essential role in the diagnosis, control and management of composite resin restorations, allowing as a whole a greater longevity of the same. The objective of this review was to identify, with a systematic approach, the evaluation criteria used in longevity studies from 2015 to date, analyze the criteria identified together with their practical utilities, and compare categories and grades according to their respective references. Materials and methods: This systematic search followed the PRISMA statement, using the keywords "Longevity - Composite restoration - Criteria" in EBSCO, SCOPUS and SCIELO databases; Using the following inclusion criteria: Studies evaluating longevity published from 2015 to date, abstract included, full text and manually included. Results: 39 clinical studies were selected to perform data collection. Of all the studies, 66.6% used some modification of the USPHS criterion, 17.9 used the FDI criterion, 7.3% used both and 7.3% used their own criterion. The most used category of the USPHS criterion was marginal adaptation and the most used grading system was A-B-C-D phonetics. 84% of the examiners performed calibration, but only 64% mentioned the percentage of agreement they obtained. Conclusion: The use of evaluation criteria is an important tool both in the clinical and scientific fields, being the modified USPHS criterion the most used, using most of its categories and grades, however, the examiners' calibration was not described in the global of the studies analyzed. An update of the criteria already proposed and the subsequent development of a single universal standardized criterion is suggestive.
Throughout dental history, the evaluation criteria for restorations and their modifications have taken an essential role in the diagnosis, control and management of composite resin restorations, allowing as a whole a greater longevity of the same. The objective of this review was to identify, with a systematic approach, the evaluation criteria used in longevity studies from 2015 to date, analyze the criteria identified together with their practical utilities, and compare categories and grades according to their respective references. Materials and methods: This systematic search followed the PRISMA statement, using the keywords "Longevity - Composite restoration - Criteria" in EBSCO, SCOPUS and SCIELO databases; Using the following inclusion criteria: Studies evaluating longevity published from 2015 to date, abstract included, full text and manually included. Results: 39 clinical studies were selected to perform data collection. Of all the studies, 66.6% used some modification of the USPHS criterion, 17.9 used the FDI criterion, 7.3% used both and 7.3% used their own criterion. The most used category of the USPHS criterion was marginal adaptation and the most used grading system was A-B-C-D phonetics. 84% of the examiners performed calibration, but only 64% mentioned the percentage of agreement they obtained. Conclusion: The use of evaluation criteria is an important tool both in the clinical and scientific fields, being the modified USPHS criterion the most used, using most of its categories and grades, however, the examiners' calibration was not described in the global of the studies analyzed. An update of the criteria already proposed and the subsequent development of a single universal standardized criterion is suggestive.
Notas
Trabajo de TitulaciĆ³n (Cirujano Dentista, Licenciado en OdontologĆa)
Palabras clave
Criterios de evaluaciĆ³n, Estudios de longevidad, Resinas compuestas, RestauraciĆ³n Dental, Materiales Dentales, Propiedades mecĆ”nicas, Chile