Construcción de pilotes v/s pilas de socalzado
Cargando...
Archivos
Fecha
2008
Autores
Profesor/a Guía
Facultad/escuela
Idioma
es
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad Andrés Bello
Nombre de Curso
Licencia CC
Licencia CC
Resumen
Existen una serie de técnicas para el sostenimiento de terrenos en obras subterráneas.
Esta investigación tiene por objetivo analizar dos de los métodos más utilizados para
entibación y socalzado en el país. La elección del sistema más apropiado depende del
tipo de suelo y las características estructurales de cada proyecto.
Los pilotes excavados mecánicamente, constituyen un sistema más rápido, tiene una
mayor seguridad y una mejor calidad, pero su costo es elevado. Este procedimiento es
recomendable cuando se tienen terrenos complejos o la profundidad de la excavación
sobrepasa los 15 [m], entre otros.
Las pilas de socalzado consisten en un procedimiento manual frecuentemente utilizado
en la zona central del país, debido a su bajo costo en comparación con otros métodos y
de sus posibilidades funcionales, como la de poder socalzar terrenos colindantes.
En esta memoria se explican los procesos constructivos de cada método, sus costos y
diferencias entre unos y otros.
There are different techniques in order to support the soils in underground construction. The objective of this investigation is to analyze two of the more used methods for underpinning and shore, used in the country. The choice of the more appropriate system, has a direct relation with soil "kind" and the own structural characteristics of each project. As first system in study there are the mechanically drilled pile, which is a fast, safe and high quality system, but it means high expenses. This system is recommended when the construction spot has complexes soils, or the drilling operation depth is higher than 15mt of depth, among others. In the other hand there are the underpin "heaps-pads", this system is a handmade one and it is one of the more used in the central region of the country due to the low associated cost among other systems and the functional possibilities that it gives, like allowing the underpin of boundary terrains. This work presents the construction processes, costs and the difference between the both methods.
There are different techniques in order to support the soils in underground construction. The objective of this investigation is to analyze two of the more used methods for underpinning and shore, used in the country. The choice of the more appropriate system, has a direct relation with soil "kind" and the own structural characteristics of each project. As first system in study there are the mechanically drilled pile, which is a fast, safe and high quality system, but it means high expenses. This system is recommended when the construction spot has complexes soils, or the drilling operation depth is higher than 15mt of depth, among others. In the other hand there are the underpin "heaps-pads", this system is a handmade one and it is one of the more used in the central region of the country due to the low associated cost among other systems and the functional possibilities that it gives, like allowing the underpin of boundary terrains. This work presents the construction processes, costs and the difference between the both methods.
Notas
Tesis (Ingeniero Constructor)
Palabras clave
Pilotes (Ingeniería Civil), Cimientos