Comparación entre carillas de resina directa y carillas de cerámica de disilicato de litio en dientes anteriores : revisión sistemática de estudios observacionales
No hay miniatura disponible
Archivos
Fecha
2022
Profesor/a Guía
Facultad/escuela
Idioma
es
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad Andrés Bello
Nombre de Curso
Licencia CC
Licencia CC
Resumen
Se realizó una revisión sistemática de estudios observacionales, cuyo objetivo fue
comparar las carillas de resina directa con las carillas de cerámica de disilicato de litio en
dientes anteriores. Se realizó una búsqueda electrónica en la base de datos Medline a través
de Pubmeb y Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source. La revisión reportó 903 registros
potenciales de los cuales 4 artículos cumplieron con los criterios de elegibilidad. Estos
artículos a modo general declaran que ambos materiales analizados presentan indicaciones
clínicas comunes para la zona anterior de los dientes, donde ambos responden de forma
favorable para dichas prescripciones, además, los artículos destacan que el sustrato ideal para
realizar las restauraciones es el esmalte, ya que brinda una adhesión confiable y duradera.
Igualmente se describen las razones de falla más frecuentes, donde se encuentran
astillamientos, fisuras, desprendimiento y microfiltración por dentina expuesta en carillas
indirectas de disilicato de litio, micro textura superficial y astillamientos en carillas directas
de composite, todas estas fallas influyen directamente en la longevidad de los tratamientos.
En conclusión, ambos tratamientos son efectivos, duraderos y satisfactorios, por tanto,
confiables en su uso siempre y cuando se realicen bajo correctos protocolos. No obstante, es
recomendable realizar más investigaciones comparativas entre los materiales para tomar
decisiones clínicas más precisas.
A systematic review of observational studies was carried out, the objective of which was to compare direct resin veneers with lithium disilicate ceramic veneers in anterior teeth. An electronic search was performed in the Medline database through Pubmeb and the Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source. The review reported 903 potential records of which 4 articles met the eligibility criteria. In general, these articles state that both materials analyzed present common clinical indications for the anterior area of the teeth, where both respond favorably to said prescriptions. In addition, the articles highlight that the ideal substrate for performing restorations is enamel, since provides reliable, long-lasting adhesion. Likewise, the most frequent reasons for failure are described, where there are splinters, fissures, detachment and microleakage due to exposed dentin in indirect lithium disilicate veneers and surface microtexture and splintering in direct composite veneers, all these failures directly influence longevity. of the treatments. In conclusion, both treatments are effective, longlasting and satisfactory, therefore, reliable in their use as long as they are carried out under correct protocols. However, further comparative research between the materials is recommended to make more accurate clinical decisions.
A systematic review of observational studies was carried out, the objective of which was to compare direct resin veneers with lithium disilicate ceramic veneers in anterior teeth. An electronic search was performed in the Medline database through Pubmeb and the Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source. The review reported 903 potential records of which 4 articles met the eligibility criteria. In general, these articles state that both materials analyzed present common clinical indications for the anterior area of the teeth, where both respond favorably to said prescriptions. In addition, the articles highlight that the ideal substrate for performing restorations is enamel, since provides reliable, long-lasting adhesion. Likewise, the most frequent reasons for failure are described, where there are splinters, fissures, detachment and microleakage due to exposed dentin in indirect lithium disilicate veneers and surface microtexture and splintering in direct composite veneers, all these failures directly influence longevity. of the treatments. In conclusion, both treatments are effective, longlasting and satisfactory, therefore, reliable in their use as long as they are carried out under correct protocols. However, further comparative research between the materials is recommended to make more accurate clinical decisions.
Notas
Tesis ( Cirujano Dentista)
Palabras clave
Materiales Dentales, Investigaciones, Resinas Compuestas