Comment on Reply to Comment of Finger et al. (2013) on: 'Evidence for an Early-Middle Miocene age of the Navidad Formation (central Chile): Paleontological, paleoclimatic and tectonic implications' of GutiƩrrez et al. (2013, Andean Geology 40 (1): 66-78)
Cargando...
Fecha
2014
Profesor/a GuĆa
Facultad/escuela
Idioma
es
TĆtulo de la revista
ISSN de la revista
TĆtulo del volumen
Editor
Servicio Nacional de GeologĆa y MinerĆa
Nombre de Curso
Licencia CC
Licencia CC
Resumen
In their answer to our Comment (Finger et al., 2013), Le Roux et al. (2013) misunderstand several of our remarks and present what we view as f lawed arguments, principally their case for a shallow-marine environment for part of the Navidad Formation. We do not wish to see this exchange evolve into an endless discussion, but we feel obligated to clarify some points. We think this is necessary because of history and importance of the Navidad Formation as the reference for the marine Miocene of Chile. Here we also expound upon some concepts relevant to the distinction between shallow-and deep-marine environments.
Notas
IndexaciĆ³n: Web of Science; Scielo
Palabras clave
Reply to Comment; Finger; Evidence for an Early-Middle Miocene age of the Navidad Formation (central Chile): Paleontological, paleoclimatic and tectonic implications; GutiƩrrez Andean Geology
CitaciĆ³n
Andean geology. Vol. 41. NĀ° 3. Santiago, 2014.