Encinas, AlfonsoFinger, Kenneth L.Nielsen, Sven NContardo, Ximena2014-12-112016-05-302014-12-112016-05-302014Andean geology. Vol. 41. N° 3. Santiago, 2014.0718-7106http://dx.doi.org/10.5027/andgeoV41n3-a07http://repositorio.unab.cl/xmlui/handle/ria/2562Indexación: Web of Science; ScieloIn their answer to our Comment (Finger et al., 2013), Le Roux et al. (2013) misunderstand several of our remarks and present what we view as f lawed arguments, principally their case for a shallow-marine environment for part of the Navidad Formation. We do not wish to see this exchange evolve into an endless discussion, but we feel obligated to clarify some points. We think this is necessary because of history and importance of the Navidad Formation as the reference for the marine Miocene of Chile. Here we also expound upon some concepts relevant to the distinction between shallow-and deep-marine environments.esReply to Comment; Finger; Evidence for an Early-Middle Miocene age of the Navidad Formation (central Chile): Paleontological, paleoclimatic and tectonic implications; Gutiérrez Andean GeologyArtículo