Presencia de sensibilidad dentinaria al utilizar técnica de sellado inmediato de dentina y técnica convencional de cementación en incrustaciones adhesivas
Cargando...
Archivos
Fecha
2012
Autores
Profesor/a Guía
Facultad/escuela
Idioma
es
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad Andrés Bello
Nombre de Curso
Licencia CC
Licencia CC
Resumen
Autores como Magne y Choi, refieren que un sellado inmediato de la dentina podría lograr un mejor
desempeño clínico evitando la microfiltración y colonización bacteriana sobre la dentina, lograr
fuerzas adhesivas mayores y un mejor ajuste marginal de la restauración a la preparación,
previniendo a si a la aparición de sensibilidad una vez cementada la restauración adhesiva. Es por
esto que el objetivo de este estudio es comparar el desempeño clínico de la técnica de sellado
inmediato de dentina en relación a la presencia de sensibilidad post cementación de incrustaciones
estéticas versus el desempeño clínico de la técnica adhesiva convencional.
La sensibilidad dentaria es la respuesta dolorosa de la dentina ante estímulos que normalmente no
producen dolor. Se caracteriza por un dolor agudo, breve y localizado inmediatamente después de la
estimulación (térmica, química o táctil) y es una causa de consulta muy frecuente entre los pacientes
que han sido sometidos a tratamientos restauradores.
Se dividió la muestra (n=40) en dos grupos de 20 pacientes cada uno, utilizando en el primero el
sellado inmediato de dentina previo a la toma de impresión, y en el segundo la técnica adhesiva
convencional previo al cementado de la incrustación. Se realizaron pruebas térmicas y físicas en las
piezas tratadas, para comparar la presencia de sensibilidad post-cementado de la incrustación en
base a una escala de sensibilidad de schiff una semana después del tratamiento. Se aplicó un test
estadístico en base a estos resultados para determinar la existencia de diferencias significativas entre
ambos grupos, la técnica SID se asocia a una menor incidencia en la presencia de sensibilidad postcementación
que la técnica convencional. En la mayoría de los casos los pacientes tratados con SID
no reportaron sensibilidad, por lo tanto, el uso de esta técnica como un método preventivo, es eficaz
para evitar la sensibilidad al cementar incrustaciones adhesivas.
Authors like Magne and Choi, refer to immediate sealing of dentin could achieve better clinical performance and preventing bacteria! colonization microleakage at dentin bond strengths to achieve greater and better marginal fit of the restoration to the preparation, preventing if the occurrence of sensitivity once cemented adhesive restoration. T his is why the aim of this study is to compare the clinical performance of immediate sealing technique in relation to dentin sensitivity presence cementing inlays post aesthetic versus clinical performance of conventional adhesive technique. The sensitivity is tooth pain response to stimuli of dentin usually painless. lt is characterized by acute, short and located immediately after stimulation (thermal, chemical or tactile) and is a frequent cause of consultation among patients who have undergone restorative. We divided the sample (n = 40) in two groups of 20 patients each, using the first immediate dentin sealing prior to impression taking, and the second technique to conventional adhesive bonding prior to embedding. Tests were done on the thermal and physical treated parts to compare the presence of post-cementing sensitivity embedding based on a schiff sensitivity scale, one week after treatment. We applied a statistical test based on these results to determine the significant differences between both groups SID technique is associated with a lower incidence in the presence of post-cementation sensitivity than the conventional technique. In most cases the treated patients reported no sensitivity SID therefore the use of this technique as a preventive method, is effective for preventing fouling sensitivity adhesive cement.
Authors like Magne and Choi, refer to immediate sealing of dentin could achieve better clinical performance and preventing bacteria! colonization microleakage at dentin bond strengths to achieve greater and better marginal fit of the restoration to the preparation, preventing if the occurrence of sensitivity once cemented adhesive restoration. T his is why the aim of this study is to compare the clinical performance of immediate sealing technique in relation to dentin sensitivity presence cementing inlays post aesthetic versus clinical performance of conventional adhesive technique. The sensitivity is tooth pain response to stimuli of dentin usually painless. lt is characterized by acute, short and located immediately after stimulation (thermal, chemical or tactile) and is a frequent cause of consultation among patients who have undergone restorative. We divided the sample (n = 40) in two groups of 20 patients each, using the first immediate dentin sealing prior to impression taking, and the second technique to conventional adhesive bonding prior to embedding. Tests were done on the thermal and physical treated parts to compare the presence of post-cementing sensitivity embedding based on a schiff sensitivity scale, one week after treatment. We applied a statistical test based on these results to determine the significant differences between both groups SID technique is associated with a lower incidence in the presence of post-cementation sensitivity than the conventional technique. In most cases the treated patients reported no sensitivity SID therefore the use of this technique as a preventive method, is effective for preventing fouling sensitivity adhesive cement.
Notas
Tesis (Cirujano Dentista, Especialización en Clínica Integral del Adulto)
Palabras clave
Materiales Dentales, Adhesivos Dentales, Clínica Integral del Adulto, Sellado inmediato de dentina, Ajuste marginal de restauración dental, Chile