Validez de la prueba de histerectomía vaginal en pacientes con indicación de vía abdominal mandatoria
Cargando...
Fecha
2010
Profesor/a Guía
Facultad/escuela
Idioma
spa
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Sociedad Chilena de Obstetricia y Ginecología
Nombre de Curso
Licencia CC
Licencia CC
Resumen
Objetivo: Evaluar la histerectomía vaginal en la resolución de patología uterina benigna, en casos que habitualmente se resuelven por histerectomía abdominal. Método: Estudio prospectivo en 68 pacientes sometidas a histerectomía vaginal en el Servicio de Ginecología del Hospital Claudio Vicuña, de San Antonio, entre junio de 2003 a junio de 2009. Son pacientes sin partos vaginales, algunas nuligestas, la mayoría con cicatrices de cesárea o historia de cirugía pélvica previa. Se separan en dos grupos, uno de dificultad moderada (DM) (útero móvil, vagina >2 dedos de diámetro, fondos de saco bien conformados) y otro de dificultad severa (DS) (útero fjo, vagina <2 dedos, o fondos de saco planos). Resultados: No hubo diferencias significativas en edad, número de cesáreas previas, número de cirugías pélvicas previas, tamaño uterino al examen físico, porcentajes de lesión vesical iatrogénica, ni conversión abdominal entre ambos grupos de pacientes. Hubo diferencias significativas en mayor tiempo operatorio y necesidad de morcelación para el grupo DS. Se destaca la ausencia de complicaciones mayores y menores en más del 93% de las pacientes. Conclusión: Nuestros resultados desmitifican las objeciones a la vía vaginal, incluso en pacientes definidas de dificultad extrema.
Objective: To assess vaginal hysterectomy in benign uterine pathology resolution in cases who are usually resolved by abdominal hysterectomy. Method: We studied, prospectively, 68 patients that were operated by vaginal hysterectomy between june 2003 to june 2009 in the Gynecology Service at Claudio Vicuña Hospital, San Antonio. Most of the patients have history of prior cesarean section or pelvic surgery, but no one has had vaginal deliveries, inclusive, some of them, have no history of previous pregnancies. The patients were separated into two groups, moderate difficulty (MD): composed by patients with uterus conserved motility, vagina >2 fingers diameter, well conserved cul de sac, and severe difficulty (SD): composed by patients with none uterine motility, vagina <2 fingers diameter or fat cul de sac. Results: We did not observed statistically significant differences in age, number of prior cesarean sections or pelvic surgeries, estimated uterine size, bladder injury, nor abdominal conversion, but there was significant differences in operative time and need of morcelation, being greater in SD patients. It is important to notice the absent of major and minor complications in 93% of the patients. Conclusion: Our results are meant to demystify the objections for vaginal route, including the patients with extreme difficulty.
Objective: To assess vaginal hysterectomy in benign uterine pathology resolution in cases who are usually resolved by abdominal hysterectomy. Method: We studied, prospectively, 68 patients that were operated by vaginal hysterectomy between june 2003 to june 2009 in the Gynecology Service at Claudio Vicuña Hospital, San Antonio. Most of the patients have history of prior cesarean section or pelvic surgery, but no one has had vaginal deliveries, inclusive, some of them, have no history of previous pregnancies. The patients were separated into two groups, moderate difficulty (MD): composed by patients with uterus conserved motility, vagina >2 fingers diameter, well conserved cul de sac, and severe difficulty (SD): composed by patients with none uterine motility, vagina <2 fingers diameter or fat cul de sac. Results: We did not observed statistically significant differences in age, number of prior cesarean sections or pelvic surgeries, estimated uterine size, bladder injury, nor abdominal conversion, but there was significant differences in operative time and need of morcelation, being greater in SD patients. It is important to notice the absent of major and minor complications in 93% of the patients. Conclusion: Our results are meant to demystify the objections for vaginal route, including the patients with extreme difficulty.
Notas
Indexación: Scielo
Palabras clave
Histerectomía vaginal, Histerectomía abdominal, Riesgo quirúrgico, Vaginal hysterectomy, Abdominal hysterectomy, Surgical risk
Citación
Revista chilena de obstetricia y ginecología, Vol. 75 N° 5, pp. 321 - 324, 2010.