Resina fluida autoadhesiva utilizada como sellante de fosas y fisuras. Estudio de microinfiltración
Cargando...
Archivos
Fecha
2013
Profesor/a Guía
Facultad/escuela
Idioma
es
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Sociedad de Periodoncia de Chile. Sociedad de Implantología Oral de Chile. Sociedad de Prótesis y Rehabilitación Oral de Chile.
Nombre de Curso
Licencia CC
Licencia CC
Resumen
RESUMEN
Objetivo: Evaluar la capacidad de sellado de una resina fluida autoadhesiva (Fusio Liquid Dentin, Pentron Clinical) utilizada como sellante de fosas y fisuras con distintos acondicionamientos de la superficie de esmalte. Materiales y Métodos: Se seleccionaron 140 terceros molares recientemente extraídos, los que fueron distribuidos aleatoriamente en cuatro grupos (n=35) y recibieron una técnica de acondicionamiento del esmalte y aplicación de un sellante. Se establecieron los siguientes grupos: Grupo 1, grabado ácido y aplicación de sellante (Clinpro, 3M ESPE); Grupo 2, grabado ácido y aplicación de resina autoadhesiva (Fusio Liquid Dentin, Pentron Clinical); Grupo 3, aplicación de resina autoadhesiva; Grupo 4, microarenado del esmalte y aplicación de resina autoadhesiva. Los dientes sellados fueron termociclados (500 ciclos, 5-55°C), y posteriormente sumergidos en solución de nitrato de plata amoniacal por 24 h (pH=14) y luego en revelador radiográfico (GBX, Kodak) por 8h. Posteriormente, los dientes fueron cortados para obtener 2 láminas por diente que fueron observadas bajo magnificación (4x) y analizadas digitalmente para evaluar la microinfiltración y la penetración en la fisura. Los resultados fueron analizados estadísticamente (ANOVA, Dunnett, p<0.05). Resultados: La microinfiltración del Grupo 1 (13.18 ± 9.25%) fue significativamente menor que la de los grupos 2, 3 y 4 (p<0.05). La penetración en la fisura en el Grupo 1 (98.92 ± 2.77%) fue mayor que en los otros grupos, siendo esta diferencia significativa sólo con el Grupo 4. Conclusión: Fusio Liquid Dentin tiene una capacidad de sellado inferior a la del sellante convencional Clinpro, independiente del acondicionamiento del esmalte que se utilice.
ABSTRACT Aim: To evaluate the sealing ability of a self-adhesive flowable composite-resin (Fusio Liquid Dentin, Pentron Clinical) with different conditioning treatments of the enamel surface used as a fissure sealant. Materials and Method: 140 recently extracted human third molars were selected and randomly divided into four groups (n=35). Each group received an enamel conditioning treatment and a sealant application. The following groups were established: Group 1, acid etching and sealant application (Clinpro, 3M ESPE); Group 2, acid etching and self-adhesive flowable composite-resin (Fusio Liquid Dentin, Pentron Clinical); Group 3, self-adhesive flowable composite-resin; Group 4, sandblasting and self-adhesive flowable composite-resin. Sealed teeth were thermocycled (500 cycles, 5-55ºC) and immersed in ammoniacal silver nitrate solution for 24 h (ph=14). After that, the teeth were immersed in radiographic developer solution (GBX, Kodak) for 8 h. Then, the teeth were vertically sectioned to obtain two slides each that were observed under magnification (4x) and digitally analyzed to assess microleakage and sealant penetration. Results were statistically analyzed (ANOVA, Dunnett, p<0.05). Results: Microleakage of Group 1 (13.18 ± 9.25%) was significantly lower than groups 2, 3 and 4 (p<0.05). Group 1 had the highest sealant penetration mean (98.92 ± 2.77%). Conclusion: Fusio Liquid Dentin had a worse sealing ability than Clinpro irrespective of their enamel conditioning treatment when used as a fissure sealant. Among Fusio’s groups, acid etching was the best enamel surface conditioning treatment.
ABSTRACT Aim: To evaluate the sealing ability of a self-adhesive flowable composite-resin (Fusio Liquid Dentin, Pentron Clinical) with different conditioning treatments of the enamel surface used as a fissure sealant. Materials and Method: 140 recently extracted human third molars were selected and randomly divided into four groups (n=35). Each group received an enamel conditioning treatment and a sealant application. The following groups were established: Group 1, acid etching and sealant application (Clinpro, 3M ESPE); Group 2, acid etching and self-adhesive flowable composite-resin (Fusio Liquid Dentin, Pentron Clinical); Group 3, self-adhesive flowable composite-resin; Group 4, sandblasting and self-adhesive flowable composite-resin. Sealed teeth were thermocycled (500 cycles, 5-55ºC) and immersed in ammoniacal silver nitrate solution for 24 h (ph=14). After that, the teeth were immersed in radiographic developer solution (GBX, Kodak) for 8 h. Then, the teeth were vertically sectioned to obtain two slides each that were observed under magnification (4x) and digitally analyzed to assess microleakage and sealant penetration. Results were statistically analyzed (ANOVA, Dunnett, p<0.05). Results: Microleakage of Group 1 (13.18 ± 9.25%) was significantly lower than groups 2, 3 and 4 (p<0.05). Group 1 had the highest sealant penetration mean (98.92 ± 2.77%). Conclusion: Fusio Liquid Dentin had a worse sealing ability than Clinpro irrespective of their enamel conditioning treatment when used as a fissure sealant. Among Fusio’s groups, acid etching was the best enamel surface conditioning treatment.
Notas
Indexación: Web of Science; Scielo
Palabras clave
Fusio Liquid Dentin, Microinfiltración, Resina fluida autoadhesiva, Sellantes, Microleakage, Sealants, Self-adhesive flowable resin
Citación
Rev. Clin. Periodoncia Implantol. Rehabil. Oral vol.6 no.1 Santiago Apr. 2013