Elipsis y aposiopesis: la reflexividad del silencio en el drama de Samuel Beckett
Cargando...
Archivos
Fecha
2018-06
Autores
Profesor/a Guía
Facultad/escuela
Idioma
es
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad Andrés Bello
Nombre de Curso
Licencia CC
Licencia CC
Resumen
Este trabajo aborda la función del silencio en el drama de
Samuel Beckett como recurso de densificación discursiva.
Para ello, se establecen las funciones tradicionales que adopta
el silencio como contrapunto y disyunción, como correlato
del diálogo, como expresión de lo inexpresable y la nueva significación y función que adquiere en el drama contemporáneo. Frente a la naturaleza estructurada y secuencial que
debiese tener el discurso como movilizador del acontecer,
precisamos la función connotativa del silencio y las pausas
como estrategia densificadora de la textualidad beckettiana.
Con ello se muestra cómo la supuesta ‘ausencia de un sentido’ en un discurso interrumpido y suspendido, se transforma
en condición significante al plegarse reflexivamente sobre el
lenguaje y no como su negación.
The following work addresses the function of silence in Samuel Beckett’s drama as a resource for discursive densification. Thus, it establishes the functions that silence adopts as a counterpoint and disjunction, as in close correlation to dialogue and as an expression of the unprofessed and also, the new meaning and function that contemporary drama acquires. Hence, in eyes of the structured and sequential nature that the dramatic discourse should have as an action prompter, we define the connotational function of silence and pauses as an strategy to densify discourse in Beckett’s textuality. Doing so allows to disclose how the supposedly “absence of sense” in a discourse that is constantly interrupted and suspended, transforms itself into a signifying condition by convoluting itself up reflexively into language and not as a denial of it.
The following work addresses the function of silence in Samuel Beckett’s drama as a resource for discursive densification. Thus, it establishes the functions that silence adopts as a counterpoint and disjunction, as in close correlation to dialogue and as an expression of the unprofessed and also, the new meaning and function that contemporary drama acquires. Hence, in eyes of the structured and sequential nature that the dramatic discourse should have as an action prompter, we define the connotational function of silence and pauses as an strategy to densify discourse in Beckett’s textuality. Doing so allows to disclose how the supposedly “absence of sense” in a discourse that is constantly interrupted and suspended, transforms itself into a signifying condition by convoluting itself up reflexively into language and not as a denial of it.
Notas
Indexación: Revista UNAB.
Palabras clave
Samuel Beckett, Reflexividad, Discurso dramático, Silencio
Citación
REVISTA DE HUMANIDADES Nº37 (ENERO-JUNIO 2018): 221-242