Logotipo del repositorio
  • Español
  • English
  • Iniciar sesión
    Ayuda

    Instrucciones:

    El Repositorio Institucional Académico (RIA) de la Universidad Andrés Bello, es un recurso de acceso abierto. No obstante, y de acuerdo con la ley chilena vigente sobre propiedad intelectual, mantiene en acceso restringido diversos documentos, los cuales sólo pueden ser consultados por la comunidad universitaria registrada. Para poder acceder a éstos, verificar el tipo de usuario y método de acceso, siguiendo las instrucciones que se detallan a continuación:

    • Si eres investigador, docente o funcionario con correo @unab.cl, ingresa utilizando tu usuario de computador o intranet (nombre de usuario sin incluir @unab.cl) y clave.
    • Si eres alumno, profesor adjunto o exalumno con correo @uandresbello.edu, debes registrarte primero, pinchando donde dice Nuevo usuario. Una vez registrado y obtenida el alta, ingresa con el correo electrónico institucional y la clave elegida. El registro se debe realizar utilizando la cuenta de correo institucional, no serán válidas cuentas gmail, hotmail o cualquier otro proveedor.
    • Si eres usuario externo, contactar directamente a repositorio@unab.cl
    o
    ¿Nuevo Usuario? Pulse aquí para registrarse¿Has olvidado tu contraseña?
  • Comunidades
  • Todo RIA
  • Contacto
  • Procedimientos de publicaciónDerecho de autorPolíticas del Repositorio
  1. Inicio
  2. Buscar por autor

Examinando por Autor "Boullosa, Daniel"

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Resultados por página
Opciones de ordenación
  • Cargando...
    Miniatura
    Ítem
    Neuromuscular and balance adaptations following basketball-specific training programs based on combined drop jump and multidirectional repeated sprint versus multidirectional plyometric training
    (Public Library of Science, 2023-03-15) Brini, Seifeddine; Boullosa, Daniel; Calleja-Gonzalez, Julio; Ramirez-Campillo, Rodrigo; Nobari, Hadi; Castagna, Carlo; Clemente, Filipe Manuel; Ardigò, Luca Paolo
    Multidirectional jumping and repeated sprint ability are crucial performance factors in basketball. The main aim of this investigation was to examine the neuromuscular performance and body balance adaptations following basketball-specific combined training programs based on drop jump and multidirectional repeated sprint versus multidirectional plyometric training. Forty-two professional basketball male players participated in the current investigation and were randomly assigned to three groups: a combined group (COMB; n = 14), a multidirectional jump group (MJG; n = 14) and an active control group (CON; n = 14). The COMB and the MJG groups completed the 8-week training programs with two weekly sessions while the CON continued their usual training. The static and dynamic balance tests, the repeated sprint ability test (IRSA5COD), the T–change of direction (CoD) test, the vertical jump tests, the five time-jump test (FJT) were performed by participants before and after the intervention period. The results showed a significant main effect of time with remarkable improvements at the end of the intervention (P < 0.001, effect size small/moderate) except the physiological parameters for IRSA5COD. Only, significant group × time interactions for body balance, T-CoD test, IRSA5COD (total time and best time), and jump tests were found (P < 0.001, effect size from trivial to moderate). Bonferroni corrected post-hoc tests revealed significantly greater improvement in favor of COMB compared to MJG for body balance, CoD and IRSA5COD (P < 0.005, effect size small/moderate). Otherwise, no significant differences between COMB and MJG concerning jump performances were found. Combined drop jump and multidirectional repeated sprint training program lead to significantly better neuromuscular performance, body balance and CoD in professional basketball players when compared with an usual training.
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    Ítem
    What do we Know about Complex-Contrast Training? A Systematic Scoping Review
    (Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, 2024-12) Thapa, Rohit K.; Weldon, Anthony; Freitas, Tomás T.; Boullosa, Daniel; Afonso, José; Granacher, Urs; Ramirez-Campillo, Rodrigo
    ckground: The complex-contrast training (CCT) method utilizes two exercises with different loads and movement velocities in a set-by-set fashion to induce multiple neuromuscular adaptations. The speculated primary mechanism involves the post-activation potentiation or post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) of the muscles used during the heavy load (low velocity) exercise, thereby improving the performance of lower load (high velocity) exercise. However, no previous study has attempted to systematically synthesize the available evidence on CCT (e.g., if post-activation potentiation or PAPE was measured during the training sessions during the intervention period). This study aimed to synthesize the available evidence on CCT using a systematic scoping review approach. More specifically, we identified gaps in the literature using an evidence gap map (EGM), and provided future directions for research. Methods: Three electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) were searched up to 20th February 2024. Data were extracted under a PICO framework: (a) Participants-related data (e.g., age, sex, type of sport); (b) Intervention-related data (e.g., duration of training); (c) Comparators (when available); and (d) Outcomes (e.g., measures of physical fitness). Interactive EGMs were created using the EPPI mapper software. Results: From the 5,695 records screened, 68 studies were eligible for inclusion, involving 1,821 participants (only 145 females from 5 studies). All CCT interventions lasted ≤ 16 weeks. More than half of the studies assessed countermovement jump, sprint, and maximal strength performances. No studies were identified which examined upper-body CCT exercises alone, and no study assessed PAPE during the CCT sessions. Overall, the available evidence was rated with a low level of confidence. Conclusions: In conclusion, whether CCT produces a PAPE that translates into longitudinal performance gains remains unclear. Moreover, the available evidence on the effects of CCT on various outcomes provides low confidence regarding the most effective way to implement this training method, particularly among females, and beyond long-term interventions. © The Author(s) 2024.