Examinando por Autor "Emeriaud, Guillaume"

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    Ítem
    Executive Summary of the Second International Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (PALICC-2)
    (Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2023-02) Emeriaud, Guillaume; López-Fernández, Yolanda M.; Iyer, Narayan Prabhu; Bembea, Melania M.; Agulnik, Asya; Barbaro, Ryan P.; Baudin, Florent; Bhalla, Anoopindar; Brunow De Carvalho, Werther; Carroll, Christopher L.; Cheifetz, Ira M.; Chisti, Mohammod J.; Cruces, Pablo; Curley, Martha A. Q.; Dahmer, Mary K.; Dalton, Heidi J.; Erickson, Simon J.; Essouri, Sandrine; Fernández, Analía; Flori, Heidi R.; Grunwell, Jocelyn R.; Jouvet, Philippe; Killien, Elizabeth Y.; Kneyber, Martin C. J.; Kudchadkar, Sapna R.; Korang, Steven Kwasi; Lee, Jan Hau; Macrae, Duncan J.; Maddux, Aline; Modesto I Alapont, Vicent; Morrow, Brenda M.; Nadkarni, Vinay M.; Napolitano, Natalie; Newth, Christopher J. L.; Pons-Odena, Martí; Quasney, Michael W.; Rajapreyar, Prakadeshwari; Rambaud, Jerome; Randolph, Adrienne G.; Rimensberger, Peter; Rowan, Courtney M.; Sanchez-Pinto, L. Nelson; Sapru, Anil; Sauthier, Michael; Shein, Steve L.; Smith, Lincoln S.; Steffen, Katerine; Takeuchi, Muneyuki; Thomas, Neal J.; Tse, Sze Man; Valentine, Stacey; Ward, Shan; Watson, R. Scott; Yehya, Nadir; Zimmerman, Jerry J.; Khemani, Robinder G.
    OBJECTIVES: We sought to update our 2015 work in the Second Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference (PALICC-2) guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS), considering new evidence and topic areas that were not previously addressed. DESIGN: International consensus conference series involving 52 multidisciplinary international content experts in PARDS and four methodology experts from 15 countries, using consensus conference methodology, and implementation science. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENTS: Patients with or at risk for PARDS. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Eleven subgroups conducted systematic or scoping reviews addressing 11 topic areas: 1) definition, incidence, and epidemiology; 2) pathobiology, severity, and risk stratification; 3) ventilatory support; 4) pulmonary-specific ancillary treatment; 5) nonpulmonary treatment; 6) monitoring; 7) noninvasive respiratory support; 8) extracorporeal support; 9) morbidity and long-term outcomes; 10) clinical informatics and data science; and 11) resource-limited settings. The search included MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost) and was updated in March 2022. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology was used to summarize evidence and develop the recommendations, which were discussed and voted on by all PALICC-2 experts. There were 146 recommendations and statements, including: 34 recommendations for clinical practice; 112 consensus-based statements with 18 on PARDS definition, 55 on good practice, seven on policy, and 32 on research. All recommendations and statements had agreement greater than 80%. CONCLUSIONS: PALICC-2 recommendations and consensus-based statements should facilitate the implementation and adherence to the best clinical practice in patients with PARDS. These results will also inform the development of future programs of research that are crucially needed to provide stronger evidence to guide the pediatric critical care teams managing these patients. Copyright 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
  • Miniatura
    Ítem
    Mechanical power in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: a PARDIE study
    (BioMed Central Ltd, 2022-12) Bhalla, Anoopindar K.; Klein, Margaret J.; Modesto I Alapont, Vicent; Emeriaud, Guillaume; Kneyber, Martin C. J.; Medina, Alberto; Cruces, Pablo; Diaz, Franco; Takeuchi, Muneyuki; Maddux, Aline B.; Mourani, Peter M.; Camilo, Cristina; White, Benjamin R.; Yehya, Nadir; Pappachan, John; Di Nardo, Matteo; Shein, Steven; Newth, Christopher; Khemani, Robinder; Poterala, Rossana; Fernandez, Analia; Vera, Antonio Ávila; Vidal, Nilda Agueda; Rosemary, Deheza; Turon, Gonzalo; Monjes, Cecilia; Serrate, Alejandro Siaba; Iolster, Thomas; Torres, Silvio; Castellani, Pablo; Giampieri, Martin; Pedraza, Claudia; Landry, Luis Martin; Althabe, Maria; Fortini, Yanina Vanesa; Erickson, Simon; Barr, Samantha; Shea, Sara; Butt, Warwick; Delzoppo, Carmel; Pintimalla, Alyssa; León, Alejandro Fabio Martínez; Rivera, Gustavo Alfredo Guzmán; Jouvet, Philippe; Dumitrascu, Mariana; French, Mary Ellen; Caro I, Daniel; Acuna, Carlos; Núnez, María José; Chen, Yang; Alarcón, Yurika Paola López; Izquierdo, Ledys María; Piñeres Olave, Byron Enrique; Hoyos, Pablo Vásquez; Bourgoin, Pierre; Baudin, Florent; Briassoulis, George; Ilia, Stavroula; Chiusolo, Fabrizio; Shime, Nobuaki
    Mechanical power is a composite variable for energy transmitted to the respiratory system over time that may better capture risk for ventilator-induced lung injury than individual ventilator management components. We sought to evaluate if mechanical ventilation management with a high mechanical power is associated with fewer ventilator-free days (VFD) in children with pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS). Methods: Retrospective analysis of a prospective observational international cohort study. Results: There were 306 children from 55 pediatric intensive care units included. High mechanical power was associated with younger age, higher oxygenation index, a comorbid condition of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, higher tidal volume, higher delta pressure (peak inspiratory pressure—positive end-expiratory pressure), and higher respiratory rate. Higher mechanical power was associated with fewer 28-day VFD after controlling for confounding variables (per 0.1 J·min−1·Kg−1 Subdistribution Hazard Ratio (SHR) 0.93 (0.87, 0.98), p = 0.013). Higher mechanical power was not associated with higher intensive care unit mortality in multivariable analysis in the entire cohort (per 0.1 J·min−1·Kg−1 OR 1.12 [0.94, 1.32], p = 0.20). But was associated with higher mortality when excluding children who died due to neurologic reasons (per 0.1 J·min−1·Kg−1 OR 1.22 [1.01, 1.46], p = 0.036). In subgroup analyses by age, the association between higher mechanical power and fewer 28-day VFD remained only in children < 2-years-old (per 0.1 J·min−1·Kg−1 SHR 0.89 (0.82, 0.96), p = 0.005). Younger children were managed with lower tidal volume, higher delta pressure, higher respiratory rate, lower positive end-expiratory pressure, and higher PCO2 than older children. No individual ventilator management component mediated the effect of mechanical power on 28-day VFD. Conclusions: Higher mechanical power is associated with fewer 28-day VFDs in children with PARDS. This association is strongest in children < 2-years-old in whom there are notable differences in mechanical ventilation management. While further validation is needed, these data highlight that ventilator management is associated with outcome in children with PARDS, and there may be subgroups of children with higher potential benefit from strategies to improve lung-protective ventilation. Take Home Message: Higher mechanical power is associated with fewer 28-day ventilator-free days in children with pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome. This association is strongest in children <2-years-old in whom there are notable differences in mechanical ventilation management. © 2021, The Author(s).