Logotipo del repositorio
  • Español
  • English
  • Iniciar sesión
    Ayuda

    Instrucciones:

    El Repositorio Institucional Académico (RIA) de la Universidad Andrés Bello, es un recurso de acceso abierto. No obstante, y de acuerdo con la ley chilena vigente sobre propiedad intelectual, mantiene en acceso restringido diversos documentos, los cuales sólo pueden ser consultados por la comunidad universitaria registrada. Para poder acceder a éstos, verificar el tipo de usuario y método de acceso, siguiendo las instrucciones que se detallan a continuación:

    • Si eres investigador, docente o funcionario con correo @unab.cl, ingresa utilizando tu usuario de computador o intranet (nombre de usuario sin incluir @unab.cl) y clave.
    • Si eres alumno, profesor adjunto o exalumno con correo @uandresbello.edu, debes registrarte primero, pinchando donde dice Nuevo usuario. Una vez registrado y obtenida el alta, ingresa con el correo electrónico institucional y la clave elegida. El registro se debe realizar utilizando la cuenta de correo institucional, no serán válidas cuentas gmail, hotmail o cualquier otro proveedor.
    • Si eres usuario externo, contactar directamente a repositorio@unab.cl
    o
    ¿Nuevo Usuario? Pulse aquí para registrarse¿Has olvidado tu contraseña?
  • Comunidades
  • Todo RIA
  • Contacto
  • Procedimientos de publicaciónDerecho de autorPolíticas del Repositorio
  1. Inicio
  2. Buscar por autor

Examinando por Autor "Kattan, Eduardo"

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Resultados por página
Opciones de ordenación
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    Ítem
    Ventilation-induced acute kidney injury in acute respiratory failure: Do PEEP levels matter?
    (BioMed Central Ltd, 0025) Benites, Martín H.; Suarez-Sipmann, Fernando; Kattan, Eduardo; Cruces, Pablo; Retamal, Jaime
    Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among critically ill patients, and mechanical ventilation (MV) plays a critical role in its management. One of the key parameters of MV is the level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), which helps to maintain an adequate lung functional volume. However, the optimal level of PEEP remains controversial. The classical approach in clinical trials for identifying the optimal PEEP has been to compare “high” and “low” levels in a dichotomous manner. High PEEP can improve lung compliance and significantly enhance oxygenation but has been inconclusive in hard clinical outcomes such as mortality and duration of MV. This discrepancy could be related to the fact that inappropriately high or low PEEP levels may adversely affect other organs, such as the heart, brain, and kidneys, which could counteract its potential beneficial effects on the lung. Patients with ARDS often develop acute kidney injury, which is an independent marker of mortality. Three primary mechanisms have been proposed to explain lung-kidney crosstalk during MV: gas exchange abnormalities, such as hypoxemia and hypercapnia; remote biotrauma; and hemodynamic changes, including reduced venous return and cardiac output. As PEEP levels increase, lung volume expands to a variable extent depending on mechanical response. This dynamic underlies two potential mechanisms that could impair venous return, potentially leading to splanchnic and renal congestion. First, increasing PEEP may enhance lung aeration, particularly in highly recruitable lungs, where previously collapsed alveoli reopen, increasing lung volume and pleural pressure, leading to vena cava compression, which can contribute to systemic venous congestion and abdominal organ impairment function. Second, in lungs with low recruitability, PEEP elevation may induce minimal changes in lung volume while increasing airway pressure, resulting in alveolar overdistension, vascular compression, and increased pulmonary vascular resistance. Therefore, we propose that high PEEP settings can contribute to renal congestion, potentially impairing renal function. This review underscores the need for further rigorous research to validate these perspectives and explore strategies for optimizing PEEP settings while minimizing adverse renal effects. © The Author(s) 2025.
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    Ítem
    Ventilation-induced acute kidney injury in acute respiratory failure: Do PEEP levels matter?
    (BioMed Central Ltd, 0025) Benites, Martín H.; Suarez-Sipmann, Fernando; Kattan, Eduardo; Cruces, Pablo; Retamal, Jaime
    Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among critically ill patients, and mechanical ventilation (MV) plays a critical role in its management. One of the key parameters of MV is the level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), which helps to maintain an adequate lung functional volume. However, the optimal level of PEEP remains controversial. The classical approach in clinical trials for identifying the optimal PEEP has been to compare “high” and “low” levels in a dichotomous manner. High PEEP can improve lung compliance and significantly enhance oxygenation but has been inconclusive in hard clinical outcomes such as mortality and duration of MV. This discrepancy could be related to the fact that inappropriately high or low PEEP levels may adversely affect other organs, such as the heart, brain, and kidneys, which could counteract its potential beneficial effects on the lung. Patients with ARDS often develop acute kidney injury, which is an independent marker of mortality. Three primary mechanisms have been proposed to explain lung-kidney crosstalk during MV: gas exchange abnormalities, such as hypoxemia and hypercapnia; remote biotrauma; and hemodynamic changes, including reduced venous return and cardiac output. As PEEP levels increase, lung volume expands to a variable extent depending on mechanical response. This dynamic underlies two potential mechanisms that could impair venous return, potentially leading to splanchnic and renal congestion. First, increasing PEEP may enhance lung aeration, particularly in highly recruitable lungs, where previously collapsed alveoli reopen, increasing lung volume and pleural pressure, leading to vena cava compression, which can contribute to systemic venous congestion and abdominal organ impairment function. Second, in lungs with low recruitability, PEEP elevation may induce minimal changes in lung volume while increasing airway pressure, resulting in alveolar overdistension, vascular compression, and increased pulmonary vascular resistance. Therefore, we propose that high PEEP settings can contribute to renal congestion, potentially impairing renal function. This review underscores the need for further rigorous research to validate these perspectives and explore strategies for optimizing PEEP settings while minimizing adverse renal effects. © The Author(s) 2025.