Logotipo del repositorio
  • Español
  • English
  • Iniciar sesión
    Ayuda

    Instrucciones:

    El Repositorio Institucional Académico (RIA) de la Universidad Andrés Bello, es un recurso de acceso abierto. No obstante, y de acuerdo con la ley chilena vigente sobre propiedad intelectual, mantiene en acceso restringido diversos documentos, los cuales sólo pueden ser consultados por la comunidad universitaria registrada. Para poder acceder a éstos, verificar el tipo de usuario y método de acceso, siguiendo las instrucciones que se detallan a continuación:

    • Si eres investigador, docente o funcionario con correo @unab.cl, ingresa utilizando tu usuario de computador o intranet (nombre de usuario sin incluir @unab.cl) y clave.
    • Si eres alumno, profesor adjunto o exalumno con correo @uandresbello.edu, debes registrarte primero, pinchando donde dice Nuevo usuario. Una vez registrado y obtenida el alta, ingresa con el correo electrónico institucional y la clave elegida. El registro se debe realizar utilizando la cuenta de correo institucional, no serán válidas cuentas gmail, hotmail o cualquier otro proveedor.
    • Si eres usuario externo, contactar directamente a repositorio@unab.cl
    o
    ¿Nuevo Usuario? Pulse aquí para registrarse¿Has olvidado tu contraseña?
  • Comunidades
  • Todo RIA
  • Contacto
  • Procedimientos de publicaciónDerecho de autorPolíticas del Repositorio
  1. Inicio
  2. Buscar por autor

Examinando por Autor "Klotz, Laurence"

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Resultados por página
Opciones de ordenación
  • Cargando...
    Miniatura
    Ítem
    Impact of COVID-19 on urology practice: A global perspective and snapshot analysis
    (MDPI, 2020-06) Gravas, Stavros; Bolton, Damien; Gomez, Reynaldo; Klotz, Laurence; Kulkarni, Sanjay; Tanguay, Simon; de la Rosette, Jean
    The global impact of the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic on urology practice remains unknown. Self-selected urologists worldwide completed an online survey by the Société Internationale d’Urologie (SIU). A total of 2494 urologists from 76 countries responded, including 1161 (46.6%) urologists in an academic setting, 719 (28.8%) in a private practice, and 614 (24.6%) in the public sector. The largest proportion (1074 (43.1%)) were from Europe, with the remainder from East/Southeast Asia (441 (17.7%)), West/Southwest Asia (386 (15.5%)), Africa (209 (8.4%)), South America (198 (7.9%)), and North America (186 (7.5%)). An analysis of differences in responses was carried out by region and practice setting. The results reveal significant restrictions in outpatient consultation and non-emergency surgery, with nonspecific efforts towards additional precautions for preventing the spread of COVID-19 during emergency surgery. These restrictions were less notable in East/Southeast Asia. Urologists often bear the decision-making responsibility regarding access to elective surgery (40.3%). Restriction of both outpatient clinics and non-emergency surgery is considerable worldwide but is lower in East/Southeast Asia. Measures to control the spread of COVID-19 during emergency surgery are common but not specific. The pandemic has had a profound impact on urology practice. There is an urgent need to provide improved guidance for this and future pandemics.
  • Cargando...
    Miniatura
    Ítem
    Prioritising Urological Surgery in the COVID-19 Era: A Global Reflection on Guidelines
    (Elsevier B.V., 2020-09) Gravas, Stavros; Fournier, Georges; Oya, Mototsugu; Summerton, Duncan; Scarpa, Roberto Mario; Chlosta, Piotr; Gkialas, Ioannis; Xie, Li-Ping; Rasyid, Nur; Bolton, Damien; Gomez, Reynaldo; Klotz, Laurence
    Background: Determining whether members follow guidelines, including guidelines prepared to help direct practice management during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, is an important goal for medical associations. Objective: To determine whether practice of urologists is in line with guidelines for the management of common urological conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic produced by leading (inter)national urological associations. Design, setting, and participants: Self-selected urologists completed a voluntary survey available online from March 27 to April 11, 2020 and distributed globally by the Société Internationale d'Urologie. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Responses to two survey questions on the (1) management of 14 common urological procedures and (2) priority scoring of 10 common urological procedures were evaluated by practice setting and geographical region using chi-square and one-way analysis of variance analyses, respectively. Results and limitations: There were 2494 respondents from 76 countries. Oncological conditions were prioritised over benign conditions, and benign conditions were deferred when feasible and safe. Oncological conditions with the greatest malignant potential were prioritised over less aggressive cancers. Respondents from Europe were least likely to postpone and most likely to prioritise conditions identified by guidelines as being of the highest priority. Respondents’ priority scoring of urological procedures closely matched the priorities assigned by guidelines. The main limitation of this study is that respondents were self-selected, and access to the survey was limited by language and technology barriers. Conclusions: Prioritisation and management of urological procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic are in line with current guidelines. The greatest agreement was reported in Europe. Observed differences may be related to limited resources in some settings. Patient summary: When deciding how best to treat patients during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, urologists are taking into account both expert recommendations and the availability of important local resources. Urologists worldwide have a high level of knowledge of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) guidelines for the management of urological conditions during the pandemic but may need to adapt their practices based on regional resource availability. © 2020 European Association of Urology