Response to Comment on “Amphibian fungal panzootic causes catastrophic and ongoing loss of biodiversity”

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorScheele, Ben C.
dc.contributor.authorPasmans, Frank
dc.contributor.authorLee F, Skerratt
dc.contributor.authorLee, Berger
dc.contributor.authorAn, Marte
dc.contributor.authorWouter, Beukema
dc.contributor.authorAcevedo, Aldemar
dc.contributor.authorBurrowes, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, Tamilie
dc.contributor.authorCatenazzi, Alessandro
dc.contributor.authorDe la Riva, Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorFisher, Matthew C
dc.contributor.authorFlechas, Sandra V
dc.contributor.authorFoster, Claire N
dc.contributor.authorFrías-Álvarez, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorTrenton W. J, . Garner
dc.contributor.authorGratwicke, Brian
dc.contributor.authorGuayasamin, Juan M
dc.contributor.authorHirschfeld, Mareike
dc.contributor.authorKolby, Jonathan
dc.contributor.author. Kosch, Tiffany
dc.contributor.authorLa Marca, Enrique
dc.contributor.authorLindenmayer, David B.
dc.contributor.authorLips, Karen R
dc.contributor.authorLongo, Ana V
dc.contributor.authorManeyro, Raúl
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, Cait A
dc.contributor.authorMendelson III, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorPalacios-Rodriguez, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorParra-Olea, Gabriela
dc.contributor.authorCorinne L, Richards-Zawack
dc.contributor.authorRödel, Mark-Oliver
dc.contributor.authorRovito, Sean M.
dc.contributor.authorSoto-Azat, Claudio
dc.contributor.authorToledo, Luís Felipe
dc.contributor.authorVoyles, Jaime
dc.contributor.authorWeldon, Ché
dc.contributor.authorWhitfield, Steven M.
dc.contributor.authorWilkinson, Mark W
dc.contributor.author. Zamudio, Kelly R
dc.contributor.authorCanessa, Stefano
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-21T04:33:10Z
dc.date.available2021-07-21T04:33:10Z
dc.date.issued2020-03
dc.descriptionIndexación: Scopuses
dc.description.abstractLambert et al. question our retrospective and holistic epidemiological assessment of the role of chytridiomycosis in amphibian declines. Their alternative assessment is narrow and provides an incomplete evaluation of evidence. Adopting this approach limits understanding of infectious disease impacts and hampers conservation efforts. We reaffirm that our study provides unambiguous evidence that chytridiomycosis has affected at least 501 amphibian species.es
dc.identifier.citationScienceOpen AccessVolume 367, Issue 648420 March 2020 Article number aay 2905es
dc.identifier.issn00368075
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.unab.cl/xmlui/handle/ria/19464
dc.language.isoenes
dc.publisherAmerican Association for the Advancement of Sciencees
dc.subjectAmphibians; Animals; Biodiversity; Chytridiomycota; Mycoses; Retrospective Studies Species Indexes
dc.titleResponse to Comment on “Amphibian fungal panzootic causes catastrophic and ongoing loss of biodiversity”es
dc.typeArtículoes
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Scheele_Response to Comment on Amphibian fungal.pdf
Tamaño:
313.76 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
TEXTO COMPLETO EN INGLÉS
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar
Colecciones
Fac.CV - Artículos de Revista