Ventilation-induced acute kidney injury in acute respiratory failure: Do PEEP levels matter?

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorBenites, Martín H.
dc.contributor.authorSuarez-Sipmann, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorKattan, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorCruces, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorRetamal, Jaime
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-09T16:29:10Z
dc.date.available2025-04-09T16:29:10Z
dc.date.issued0025
dc.descriptionINDEXACION SCOPUS
dc.description.abstractAcute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among critically ill patients, and mechanical ventilation (MV) plays a critical role in its management. One of the key parameters of MV is the level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), which helps to maintain an adequate lung functional volume. However, the optimal level of PEEP remains controversial. The classical approach in clinical trials for identifying the optimal PEEP has been to compare “high” and “low” levels in a dichotomous manner. High PEEP can improve lung compliance and significantly enhance oxygenation but has been inconclusive in hard clinical outcomes such as mortality and duration of MV. This discrepancy could be related to the fact that inappropriately high or low PEEP levels may adversely affect other organs, such as the heart, brain, and kidneys, which could counteract its potential beneficial effects on the lung. Patients with ARDS often develop acute kidney injury, which is an independent marker of mortality. Three primary mechanisms have been proposed to explain lung-kidney crosstalk during MV: gas exchange abnormalities, such as hypoxemia and hypercapnia; remote biotrauma; and hemodynamic changes, including reduced venous return and cardiac output. As PEEP levels increase, lung volume expands to a variable extent depending on mechanical response. This dynamic underlies two potential mechanisms that could impair venous return, potentially leading to splanchnic and renal congestion. First, increasing PEEP may enhance lung aeration, particularly in highly recruitable lungs, where previously collapsed alveoli reopen, increasing lung volume and pleural pressure, leading to vena cava compression, which can contribute to systemic venous congestion and abdominal organ impairment function. Second, in lungs with low recruitability, PEEP elevation may induce minimal changes in lung volume while increasing airway pressure, resulting in alveolar overdistension, vascular compression, and increased pulmonary vascular resistance. Therefore, we propose that high PEEP settings can contribute to renal congestion, potentially impairing renal function. This review underscores the need for further rigorous research to validate these perspectives and explore strategies for optimizing PEEP settings while minimizing adverse renal effects. © The Author(s) 2025.
dc.identifier.issn13648535
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unab.cl/handle/ria/64086
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd
dc.subjectAcute kidney injury; Acute respiratory failure; Positive end-expiratory pressure; Venous congestion
dc.titleVentilation-induced acute kidney injury in acute respiratory failure: Do PEEP levels matter?
dc.typeArtículo
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
Ventilationinduced-acute-kidney-injury-in-acute-respiratory-failure-Do-PEEP-levels-matterCritical-Care.pdf
Tamaño:
1.53 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar
Colecciones
Fac.CV - Artículos de Revista