Comparative Analysis of Bilateral Deficits in Elbow Flexion Strength: Functional vs. Analytical Assessment

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorPelayo-Tejo, Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorChirosa-Ríos, Luis
dc.contributor.authorEscobar-Molina, Raquel
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Ramos, Amador
dc.contributor.authordel-Cuerpo, Indya
dc.contributor.authorChirosa-Ríos, Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorJerez-Mayorga, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-23T13:02:58Z
dc.date.available2024-09-23T13:02:58Z
dc.date.issued2024-09
dc.descriptionIndexación: Scopus.
dc.description.abstractBackground: this study aimed to identify the influence of postural stability on upper-limb bilateral deficit (BLD), and to compare the assessment of strength generated during elbow flexion functionally vs. analytically in the dominant and nondominant arms. Methods: Twenty men participated in two sessions to evaluate the maximum isometric strength of elbow flexion. This evaluation was performed unilaterally with the dominant arm, unilaterally with the non-dominant arm, and bilaterally, both in the sitting position (SiP) and the standing position (StP). Results: The BLD when peak force was considered was lower for StP (−6.44 ± 5.58%) compared to SiP (−10.73 ± 6.17%) (p = 0.007). Regarding peak force, statistically significant differences were observed for comparisons between dominance (p < 0.001) and Position*Dominance (p = 0.02), but mean force differences were only observed for the dominance factor (p < 0.001). Greater mean and peak forces were always produced bilaterally compared to unilaterally (p < 0.001). Conclusions: a decrease in postural stability by performing elbow flexion exercises in a standing position accentuates BLD of peak force.
dc.description.urihttps://www-scopus-com.recursosbiblioteca.unab.cl/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85203643533&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&sid=d871507efdf29be90bed61a76999276a&sot=aff&sdt=cl&cluster=scosubjabbr%2C%22COMP%22%2Ct%2Bscosubtype%2C%22ar%22%2Ct%2Bscoafid%2C%2260002636%22%2Ct%2Bscofreetoread%2C%22all%22%2Ct%2C%22publisherfullgold%22%2Ct&s=AF-ID%2860002636%29+AND+SUBJAREA%28COMP%29&sl=34&sessionSearchId=d871507efdf29be90bed61a76999276a&relpos=3
dc.identifier.citationApplied Sciences (Switzerland) Open Access Volume 14, Issue 17 September 2024 Article number 7808
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/app14177808
dc.identifier.issn20763417
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unab.cl/handle/ria/60400
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 Attribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectbilateral index
dc.subjectisometric contraction
dc.subjectmuscle strength dynamometer
dc.subjectneuromuscular
dc.titleComparative Analysis of Bilateral Deficits in Elbow Flexion Strength: Functional vs. Analytical Assessment
dc.typeArtículo
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
Comparative-Analysis-of-Bilateral-Deficits-in-Elbow-Flexion-Strength-Functional-vs-Analytical-Assessment.pdf
Tamaño:
1.68 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
TEXTO COMPLETO EN INGLÉS
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar
Colecciones
FCR - Artículos de Revista