Discurso y terror. Del lenguaje de la política a la política del lenguaje
Cargando...
Archivos
Fecha
2024-12
Autores
Profesor/a Guía
Facultad/escuela
Idioma
es
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad Andrés Bello
Nombre de Curso
Licencia CC
Licencia CC
Resumen
Durante el Gran Terror en Francia (1793-1794), la Convención Nacional liderada por los jacobinos impuso una serie de medidas tendientes a infundir miedo mediante la violencia estatal. Dada su importancia y ejemplaridad, este período se convirtió en un arquetipo de los regímenes autoritarios, en los que la legalidad queda suspendida y reina la sospecha y la arbitrariedad. De este modo, Terror pasó a significar, además de un período histórico, una forma de ejercer el poder. Ahora bien, durante el siglo XX, el interés por la relación entre política, lenguaje e ideología llevó a diversas disciplinas a volver a analizar el Gran Terror, haciendo énfasis en el lenguaje político utilizado. El siguiente artículo se propone analizar el Terror bajo una nueva perspectiva: la de las políticas del lenguaje. Para ello, se analizan las posiciones de Saint-Just y Robespierre, líderes principales del jacobinismo. Con ello se intenta abrir nuevas preguntas y comprensiones dela relación entre política y lenguaje.
During the Great Terror in France (1793-1794), the Jacobinled National Convention took a series of actions aiming to instill fear through State violence. Because of its importance and exemplary nature, this period became an archetype of authoritarian regimes, in which legality is suspended and suspicion and arbitrariness reign. Thus, in addition to a historical period, Terror came to signify a way of exercising power. Yet, during the twentieth century, interest in the relationship between politics, language and ideology led various disciplines to reanalyze the Great Terror, with emphasis on the political language they used. The following article aims to analyze the Terror from a new perspective: that of the politics of language. For this purpose, we analyze the positions of Saint-Just and Robespierre, main leaders of Jacobinism. The aim is to open up new questions and new understandings of the relationship between politics and language.
During the Great Terror in France (1793-1794), the Jacobinled National Convention took a series of actions aiming to instill fear through State violence. Because of its importance and exemplary nature, this period became an archetype of authoritarian regimes, in which legality is suspended and suspicion and arbitrariness reign. Thus, in addition to a historical period, Terror came to signify a way of exercising power. Yet, during the twentieth century, interest in the relationship between politics, language and ideology led various disciplines to reanalyze the Great Terror, with emphasis on the political language they used. The following article aims to analyze the Terror from a new perspective: that of the politics of language. For this purpose, we analyze the positions of Saint-Just and Robespierre, main leaders of Jacobinism. The aim is to open up new questions and new understandings of the relationship between politics and language.
Notas
Indexación: Revista UNAB.
Palabras clave
Terror, Jean Paulhan, Louis de Saint-Just, Políticas del lenguaje, Lenguaje de la política, Of langage, Langage of politics
Citación
Revista de Humanidades Nº50 (julio-diciembre) : 189-212
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53382/issn.2452-445X.832