Can baseline features predict a reduction in pain and disability following neck-specific exercise in people with chronic non-specific neck pain?: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

dc.contributor.authorChen, Ziyan
dc.contributor.authorFalla, Deborah
dc.contributor.authorElgueta Cancino, Edith
dc.contributor.authorA Deane, Janet
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-23T02:19:41Z
dc.date.available2023-10-23T02:19:41Z
dc.date.issued2023-07-10
dc.descriptionINDEXACIÓN: SCOPUS.es
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Neck-specific exercises (NSEs) are commonly used for the treatment of chronic non-specific neck pain (CNSNP). However, it remains unclear whether baseline features can predict the response to neck-specific exercise (NSE) in people with CNSNP. This systematic review aims to assess whether baseline features such as age, gender, muscle activity, fatigability, endurance and fear of movement can predict pain and disability reduction following a NSE intervention. Methods and analysis This systematic review and meta-analysis will be reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Protocols guidelines checklist. The Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases; key journals; and grey literature will be searched up until June 2023, including medical subject heading terms and keywords combinations. Included studies will investigate an association between the baseline features and pain and disability outcomes following NSE in people with CNSNP. Two independent reviewers will oversee the searching, screening, data extraction and assessment of risk of bias. The risk of bias will be assessed using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) and Risk-Of-Bias tool for randomised trials 2 (ROB 2). The quality of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach (GRADE). Using standardised forms, details regarding study characteristics, baseline features (predictive factors), intervention, primary outcome and effect size (OR and 95% CI of each predictive factor and p value) will be extracted from included studies. Meta-analyses will be considered, if the studies are sufficiently homogeneous and if three or more studies investigate the same or comparable factors that predict the same response (pain intensity or disability). In the event that less than three studies investigated the same factors, a narrative synthesis will be conducted. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval will not be required as this review will be based on published studies. The results of this study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and presented at conferences. PROSPERO registration number CRD42023408332. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.es
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Open, Volume 13, Issue 710, July 2023, Article number e074494es
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074494
dc.identifier.issn20446055
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unab.cl/xmlui/handle/ria/53533
dc.language.isoenes
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupes
dc.rights.licenseCC BY-NC 4.0 DEED Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectmusculoskeletal disorderses
dc.subjectpain managementes
dc.subjectrehabilitation medicinees
dc.subjectspinees
dc.subjectsports medicinees
dc.titleCan baseline features predict a reduction in pain and disability following neck-specific exercise in people with chronic non-specific neck pain?: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocoles
dc.typeArtículoes
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
e074494.full.pdf
Tamaño:
404.48 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
TEXTO COMPLETO EN INGLÉS.
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: