Sistemas de resinas para fijación de restauraciones indirectas en cerámicas feldespáticas : revisión sistemática
No hay miniatura disponible
Archivos
Fecha
2022
Profesor/a Guía
Facultad/escuela
Idioma
es
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad Andrés Bello
Nombre de Curso
Licencia CC
Licencia CC
Resumen
Esta revisión sistemática se centró en comparar las resinas de restauración
precalentadas (RRP), con el uso de cementos de resina (CR), para la fijación de
restauraciones indirectas y su éxito a largo plazo. Las propiedades mecánicas que
determinaran el éxito, son resistencia a la fractura, tracción y adaptación marginal. Se realizó
una búsqueda electrónica de artículos publicados, en Scopus, Medline a través de Pubmed y
SciELO, donde se buscaron los términos “preheated resin” y “ceramic feldsphatic fixation”,
en idioma inglés. La búsqueda reportó que la utilización de resina precalentada tiene
propiedades mecánicas similares al cemento de resina, pero la gran diferencia entre ellas es
que la resina precalentada brinda un mejor manejo clínico y promueve una mayor fuerza de
adhesión inmediata debido a que presenta mayor carga de relleno y un módulo de elasticidad
más alto, permitiendo dar un mejor ajuste de la restauración indirecta a la pieza dentaria
This systematic review focused on comparing preheated restorative resins (PRC), with the use of resin cements (RC), for the luting of indirect restorations and their long-term success. The mechanical properties that will determine success are resistance to fracture, traction and marginal adaptation. An electronic search of published articles was carried out in Scopus, Medline through Pubmed and SciELO, where the terms "preheated resin" and "ceramic feldsphatic fixation" were searched in English. The search reported that the use of preheated resin has mechanical properties similar to resin cement, but the great difference between them is that the preheated resin provides better clinical management and promotes greater immediate bond strength due to its higher filler load. and a higher modulus of elasticity, allowing a better fit of the indirect restoration to the tooth
This systematic review focused on comparing preheated restorative resins (PRC), with the use of resin cements (RC), for the luting of indirect restorations and their long-term success. The mechanical properties that will determine success are resistance to fracture, traction and marginal adaptation. An electronic search of published articles was carried out in Scopus, Medline through Pubmed and SciELO, where the terms "preheated resin" and "ceramic feldsphatic fixation" were searched in English. The search reported that the use of preheated resin has mechanical properties similar to resin cement, but the great difference between them is that the preheated resin provides better clinical management and promotes greater immediate bond strength due to its higher filler load. and a higher modulus of elasticity, allowing a better fit of the indirect restoration to the tooth
Notas
Tesis (Cirujano Dentista)
Palabras clave
Restauración Dental, Materiales Dentales, Investigaciones