Algunas reflexiones sobre la ira en Tomás de Aquino y Séneca
Cargando...
Archivos
Fecha
2021-06
Autores
Profesor/a Guía
Facultad/escuela
Idioma
es
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad Andrés Bello
Nombre de Curso
Licencia CC
Licencia CC
Resumen
En este texto, se analizan las doctrinas filosóficas de Tomás de Aquino y Séneca sobre la ira. El propósito es articular una conexión entre el pensamiento de ambos autores en relación con la noción de ira. La tesis que se plantea es que aun partiendo cada uno de tradiciones diferentes existen coincidencias en sus visiones acerca de la ira, principalmente en relación con los recursos que ambos ofrecen para el manejo racional de ella. Con este propósito, se plantea i) un esquema de la naturaleza de la ira en Tomás; ii) una exposición sobre la naturaleza de la ira en Séneca; iii) se analizan los puntos de contacto entre ambos autores, partiendo de los recursos comunes propuestos por ellos; y, por último, iv) una valoración general derivada del análisis previo.
This article addresses Aquinas and Seneca’s philosophical doctrines on anger. The author tries to establish a bound between both authors in regard to the notion of anger. The proposal grounds on the fact that, although Aquinas and Seneca come from divergent philosophical traditions, there’s a compatibility between both visions of anger, mainly in regard to the similar tools posed by them to attain a rational handling of the aforementioned emotion. For this purpose, I approach the issue: (1) firstly, laying out the causal nature of anger in Aquinas; (2) secondly, describing the causal nature of anger in Seneca; (3) thirdly, analyzing the commonalities between both thinkers, based on the similarity of the resources quoted by them; and (4) finally, a general appraisal derived from the preceding analysis.
This article addresses Aquinas and Seneca’s philosophical doctrines on anger. The author tries to establish a bound between both authors in regard to the notion of anger. The proposal grounds on the fact that, although Aquinas and Seneca come from divergent philosophical traditions, there’s a compatibility between both visions of anger, mainly in regard to the similar tools posed by them to attain a rational handling of the aforementioned emotion. For this purpose, I approach the issue: (1) firstly, laying out the causal nature of anger in Aquinas; (2) secondly, describing the causal nature of anger in Seneca; (3) thirdly, analyzing the commonalities between both thinkers, based on the similarity of the resources quoted by them; and (4) finally, a general appraisal derived from the preceding analysis.
Notas
Indexación: Revista UNAB.
Palabras clave
Ira, Iracundia, Emoción, Voluntad, Pasión
Citación
Revista de Humanidades Nº43 (enero-junio 2021): 293-324