Validity, Reliability, and Sensitivity of Mobile Applications to Assess Change of Direction Speed

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorUysal, Hüseyin Şahin
dc.contributor.authorOjeda-Aravena, Alex
dc.contributor.authorUlaş, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorMartín, Eduardo Báez-San
dc.contributor.authorRamirez-Campillo, Rodrigo
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-17T22:00:54Z
dc.date.available2024-05-17T22:00:54Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.descriptionIndexación: Scopus.
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to assess the validity, reliability, and sensitivity of mobile applications for assessing change-of-direction speed (CODS) performance. Thirty college athletes performed two Illinois CODS tests during one session. Assessments were carried out simultaneously using six devices (the CODTimer app, Seconds Count app, StopwatchCamera app, two analog stopwatches, and timing gates). Validity analyses included Pearson's product-moment correlation analysis, a linear regression model, and Bland-Altman plots. Reliability analyses included the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), the coefficient of variation (CV%), and the paired-sample t test. Sensitivity analyses included the typical error and smallest worthwhile change (SWC). The results showed that validity, reliability, and sensitivity values were higher for the CODTimer app (r = 0.99, R2 = 0.99, mean bias = −0.03 ± 0.10, CV% = 3.21, ICC = 0.89, SWC rating: good, p = 0.84) and the Seconds Count app (r = 0.99, R2 = 0.99, mean bias = −0.03 ± 0.08, CV% = 3.28, ICC = 0.88, SWC rating: good, p = 0.84) relative to the StopwatchCamera app (r = 0.98, R2 = 0.97, mean bias = −0.11 ± 0.22, CV% = 3.43, ICC = 0.86, SWC rating: marginal, p = 0.10), Analog Stopwatch 1 (r = 0.98, R2 = 0.96, mean bias = −0.09 ± 0.42, CV% = 2.95, ICC = 0.90, SWC rating: good, p = 0.91), and Analog Stopwatch 2 (r = 0.99, R2 = 0.97, mean bias = −0.12 ± 0.88, CV% = 3.51, ICC = 0.87, SWC rating: marginal, p = 0.96). In conclusion, compared to timing gates, the CODTimer app and Seconds Count app provided lower measurement bias and higher sensitivity for assessing CODS performance. © 2023, Termedia Publishing House Ltd.. All rights reserved.
dc.description.urihttps://jhk.termedia.pl/Validity-Reliability-and-Sensitivity-of-Mobile-Applications-nto-Assess-Change-of,167465,0,2.html
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Human Kinetics. Volume 88, Pages 217 - 228. 2023
dc.identifier.doi10.5114/jhk/167465
dc.identifier.issn1640-5544
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unab.cl/handle/ria/56895
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTermedia Publishing House Ltd.
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 DEED Atribución 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es
dc.subjectAthletes
dc.subjectAthletic Performance
dc.subjectConditioning
dc.subjectPhysical Fitness
dc.subjectSports
dc.titleValidity, Reliability, and Sensitivity of Mobile Applications to Assess Change of Direction Speed
dc.typeArtículo
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
Uysal_Validity_Reliability_and_Sensitivity_of_Mobile_2023.pdf
Tamaño:
491.35 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
TEXTO COMPLETO EN INGLÉS
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar
Colecciones
FCR - Artículos de Revista