The Effects of Two Different Concurrent Training Configurations on Markers of Metabolic Syndrome and Fitness in Women With Severe/Morbid Obesity: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorDelgado Floody, Pedro
dc.contributor.authorSoriano Maldonado, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Pérez, Manuel A
dc.contributor.authorLatorre Román, Pedro Ángel
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Salazar, Cristian
dc.contributor.authorVargas, Claudia Andrea
dc.contributor.authorCaamaño Navarrete, Felipe
dc.contributor.authorJerez Mayorga, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorÁlvarez, Cristian
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-04T20:14:53Z
dc.date.available2022-05-04T20:14:53Z
dc.date.issued2021-09
dc.descriptionIndexación:Scopuses
dc.description.abstractConcurrent training (CT), characterised by combining both aerobic and resistance training modalities within the same session, is recognised to improve metabolic syndrome (MetS) markers, but little is known about the effects of different configurations (i.e., order) of these exercise modalities on MetS markers and the interindividual responses. The purpose of the present study was to describe the effects, and the interindividual variability, of 20weeks of two CT configurations (i.e., high intensity interval training (HIIT) plus resistance training (RT), compared with RT plus HIIT) in women with severe/morbid obesity. Overall, 26 women with severe/morbid obesity were assigned either to HIIT+RT [n=14, mean and 95%CI, 45.79 (40.74; 50.83) or RT+HIIT (n=12), 33.6 (25.30; 41.79) years]. MetS-related outcomes were waist circumference (WC, cm), systolic (SBP, mmHg) and diastolic (DBP, mmHg) blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c), triglycerides (Tg), and fasting plasma glucose (FPG). Secondary outcomes were other anthropometrics, body composition, lipids, muscle strength, and the six-minute walk test (6Mwt). There were significant differences in the prevalence of nonresponders (NRs) only for WC comparing HIIT+RT 2 (18.1%) vs. RT+HIIT group 5 (50.0%), p[removed]0.05. Additionally, the RT+HIIT group showed significant reductions in WC (∆ –3.84cm, p=0.015), SBP (∆ –8.46mmHg, p=0.040), whereas the HIIT+RT group elicited significant reductions only in SBP (∆ –8.43mmHg, p=0.022). The HIIT+RT promoted a lower prevalence of NRs than the RT+HIIT configuration on WC, and overall, there were slightly more beneficial training-induced effects on markers of MetS in the RT+HIIT group compared to the HIIT+RT group. © Copyright © 2021 Delgado-Floody, Soriano-Maldonado, Rodríguez-Pérez, Latorre-Román, Martínez-Salazar, Vargas, Caamaño-Navarrete, Jerez-Mayorga and Álvarez.es
dc.description.urihttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2021.694798/full
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Physiology Volume 1221 September 2021 Article number 694798es
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fphys.2021.694798
dc.identifier.issn1664-042X
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unab.cl/xmlui/handle/ria/22460
dc.language.isoenes
dc.publisherFrontiers Media S.A.es
dc.rights.licenseAtribución 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es
dc.subjectConcurent traininges
dc.subjectExercise orderes
dc.subjectExercise traininges
dc.subjectInterindividual variabilityes
dc.subjectMetabolic syndromees
dc.subjectMorbid obesityes
dc.titleThe Effects of Two Different Concurrent Training Configurations on Markers of Metabolic Syndrome and Fitness in Women With Severe/Morbid Obesity: A Randomised Controlled Triales
dc.typeArtículoes
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Delgado_P_The_Effects_of_Two_Different_2021_Article.pdf
Tamaño:
4.3 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
TEXTO COMPLETO EN INGLES
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar
Colecciones
FCR - Artículos de Revista