Empatía y ecualización en estudiantes de odontología en una universidad chilena
No hay miniatura disponible
Archivos
Fecha
2022
Profesor/a Guía
Díaz Narváez, Víctor Patricio, 1950-
López Tagle, Elizabeth
López Tagle, Elizabeth
Facultad/escuela
Idioma
es
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad Andrés Bello
Nombre de Curso
Licencia CC
Licencia CC
Resumen
Objetivo. Explorar el cumplimiento del principio de ecualización de la empatía con
el paciente en los estudiantes de la Facultad Odontología de la Universidad
Andrés Bello, situados en dos sedes: República (Región Metropolitana) y Viña del
Mar (Quinta Región), Chile.
Material y métodos. Fue empleada la Escala de Empatía Médica de Jefferson
(versión S) adaptada por criterio de Jueces para estudiantes de Odontología. Se
estimaron las medias, error estándar de las medias y el intervalo de confianza de
los datos en torno de la media dentro y entre los tres factores estudiados: Sedes,
Curso y Sexo y sus interacciones. Fueron comparadas las medias de los niveles
mediante un Análisis de Varianza Trifactorial. Se estimó la prueba eta cuadrada y
la potencia de la prueba para determinar la magnitud de las diferencias y la
potencia del modelo estadístico empleado. El nivel de significación utilizado fue de
α<0,05 y β<0,20.
Resultados. Se encontraron pocas diferencias significativas entre las medias. Las
diferencias fundamentales afectaron principalmente a una de las dimensiones
cognitivas de la empatía: “Habilidad para entender a otros”. Aunque la simetría de
los niveles de los factores y sus interacciones no afectan totalmente la similaridad
del comportamiento empático entre las Sedes de la universidad estudiada, la
presencia de diferencias muestra la necesidad de prestar más atención a la
formación empática en los estudiantes de odontología de ambos Sedes
estudiados.
Conclusiones. La ecualización empática entre los estudiantes de odontología se
cumple en general. Es necesario considerar estas diferencias encontradas entre
los Sedes para analizar las causas que las producen y realizar las intervenciones
pertinentes para disminuir estas diferencias.
Introduction. To explore compliance with the principle of equalization of empathy in two locations or Sedeses of Universidad Andrés Bello, Chile. Material and methods. The Jefferson Medical Empathy Scale (version S) was used, adapted by the criteria of Judges for Dentistry students. The means, standard error of the means and the confidence interval of the data around the mean within and between the three factors studied were estimated: Sedes, Course and Sex and their interactions. The means of the levels were compared by means of a Three-factor Analysis of Variance. The eta squared test and the power of the test were estimated to determine the magnitude of the differences and the power of the statistical model used. The significance level used was α<0.05 and β<0.20. Results. Few significant differences were found between the means. The fundamental differences mainly affected one of the cognitive dimensions of empathy: “Ability to understand others”. Although the symmetry of the levels of the factors and their interactions do not totally affect the similarity of empathic behavior between the campus of the university studied, the presence of differences shows the need to pay more attention to empathic training in dental students. Conclusions. The empathic equalization among dental students is generally fulfilled. It is necessary to consider these differences found between the venues to analyze the causes that produce them and carry out the pertinent interventions to reduce these differences.
Introduction. To explore compliance with the principle of equalization of empathy in two locations or Sedeses of Universidad Andrés Bello, Chile. Material and methods. The Jefferson Medical Empathy Scale (version S) was used, adapted by the criteria of Judges for Dentistry students. The means, standard error of the means and the confidence interval of the data around the mean within and between the three factors studied were estimated: Sedes, Course and Sex and their interactions. The means of the levels were compared by means of a Three-factor Analysis of Variance. The eta squared test and the power of the test were estimated to determine the magnitude of the differences and the power of the statistical model used. The significance level used was α<0.05 and β<0.20. Results. Few significant differences were found between the means. The fundamental differences mainly affected one of the cognitive dimensions of empathy: “Ability to understand others”. Although the symmetry of the levels of the factors and their interactions do not totally affect the similarity of empathic behavior between the campus of the university studied, the presence of differences shows the need to pay more attention to empathic training in dental students. Conclusions. The empathic equalization among dental students is generally fulfilled. It is necessary to consider these differences found between the venues to analyze the causes that produce them and carry out the pertinent interventions to reduce these differences.
Notas
Tesis (Cirujano Dentista)