Etiología de fracturas maxilofaciales : scoping review
No hay miniatura disponible
Archivos
Fecha
2022
Profesor/a Guía
Facultad/escuela
Idioma
es
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad Andrés Bello
Nombre de Curso
Licencia CC
Licencia CC
Resumen
Objetivos: El objetivo de este estudio es identificar las etiologías que producen
fracturas maxilofaciales más frecuentes en la actualidad, y así establecer su
prevalencia respecto a edad, género y tipo de fractura del macizo craneofacial que
afectan más.
Material y método: Se realizó una revisión sistemática exploratoria o scoping
review de evidencia actualizada aplicando la guía de extensión de la declaración
PRISMA. La búsqueda electrónica se ejecutó en las bases de datos Pubmed,
Epistemonikos, LILACS y Science Direct, mediante términos Mesh y/o palabras
claves. La selección de estudios se desarrolló en base a los criterios de inclusión y
exclusión previamente definidos.
Resultados y conclusiones: Para este estudio se recopilaron un total de 11
artículos, donde se obtuvo como mayor factor etiológico de fractura maxilofacial los
accidentes de tránsito (55,3%), seguido de las caídas (18%), en tercer lugar la
violencia interpersonal (17,6%), cuarto puesto para otras etiologías (4,9%), quinto
lugar para deportes (3,1) y finalmente los accidentes de trabajo (1%). Afectando
principalmente a pacientes de género masculino, en el grupo etario de 20-40 años,
siendo la mandíbula el hueso más afectado por fracturas.
Objective: The objective of this study is to identify the most frequent etiologies regarding maxillofacial fractures, presented nowadays, and thus establish their prevalence with respect to age, gender and type of fracture of the craniofacial massif that affect the most. Material and method: An explorative systematic review or scoping review for updated evidence was carried out applying the extension guide of the PRISMA statement. The electronic search was carried out in the Pubmed, Epistemonikos, LILACS and Science Direct databases, using Mesh terms and/or keywords. The selection of studies was developed, taking into account the previously defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results and conclusions: For this study 11 articles were collected, where traffic accidents (55,3%) were the greatest etiological factor of maxillofacial fracture, followed by falls (18%), in third place interpersonal violence (17,6%), fourth place for other etiologies (4,9%), five place to sports (3,1%), and finally the six place to work accidents (1%). Mainly affecting male patients, in the age group of 20-40 years, being the jaw bone the one most affected by fractures.
Objective: The objective of this study is to identify the most frequent etiologies regarding maxillofacial fractures, presented nowadays, and thus establish their prevalence with respect to age, gender and type of fracture of the craniofacial massif that affect the most. Material and method: An explorative systematic review or scoping review for updated evidence was carried out applying the extension guide of the PRISMA statement. The electronic search was carried out in the Pubmed, Epistemonikos, LILACS and Science Direct databases, using Mesh terms and/or keywords. The selection of studies was developed, taking into account the previously defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results and conclusions: For this study 11 articles were collected, where traffic accidents (55,3%) were the greatest etiological factor of maxillofacial fracture, followed by falls (18%), in third place interpersonal violence (17,6%), fourth place for other etiologies (4,9%), five place to sports (3,1%), and finally the six place to work accidents (1%). Mainly affecting male patients, in the age group of 20-40 years, being the jaw bone the one most affected by fractures.
Notas
Tesis (Cirujano Dentista)
Palabras clave
Traumatismos Maxilofaciales, Investigaciones, Maxillofacial injuries, Epidemiology, Etiology, Accidents