Uso de poliéter éter cetona (PEEK) en odontología : revisión sistemática
No hay miniatura disponible
Archivos
Fecha
2023
Profesor/a Guía
Facultad/escuela
Idioma
es
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad Andrés Bello
Nombre de Curso
Licencia CC
Licencia CC
Resumen
Resumen: La polieteretercetona (PEEK) es un material biocompatible y resistente que ha sido
propuesto como alternativa al titanio para la fabricación de implantes dentales, pero su uso en este
campo aún está en desarrollo. Objetivo: Analizar comparativamente las propiedades físicas,
biocompatibilidad y desempeño clínico de la PEEK y el titanio como materiales para implantes
dentales. Metodología: Se realizó una búsqueda electrónica de revisiones sistemáticas en la base
de datos Scopus, Medline/Pubmed, Web of Science y ScienceDirect, donde se aplicó la estrategia
“Polyetheretherketone AND dental implants AND titanium AND implant abutment” para
recuperar artículos en idioma inglés publicados entre los años 2018 a 2023”. Resultados: La
búsqueda identifico 381 artículos de los cuales solo 2 cumplieron los criterios de elegibilidad,
indicando estas revisiones a modo general que la PEEK posee excelentes atributos mecánicos y
químicos, además de una buena estabilidad térmica, siendo considerada como una herramienta
prometedora para aplicar en procedimientos de implantología. No obstante, la PEEK ha reportado
algunos inconvenientes como mayor número de micro ranuradas, filtración y fracturas en entornos
bucales, conllevando una baja integración con tejidos circundantes. Conclusión: La PEEK no logra
cumplir totalmente con las exigencias físicas y mecánicas requeridas para reemplazar de manera
definitiva al titanio como pilar de implante dental, siendo un material alternativo provisional.
Abstract: Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) is a biocompatible and resistant material that has been proposed as an alternative to titanium for the manufacture of dental implants, but its use in this field is still under development. Objective: To comparatively analyze the physical properties, biocompatibility and clinical performance of PEEK and titanium as materials for dental implants. Methodology: An electronic search of systematic reviews was carried out in the Scopus, Medline/Pubmed, Web of Science and ScienceDirect databases, where the strategy “Polyetheretherketone AND dental implants AND Titanium AND implant abutment” was applied to retrieve published articles in English between the years 2018 to 2023.” Results: The search identified 381 articles of which only 2 met the eligibility criteria, these reviews generally indicating that PEEK has excellent mechanical and chemical attributes, in addition to good thermal stability, being considered a promising tool to be applied in implantology procedures. However, PEEK has reported some drawbacks such as a greater number of microgrooves, leaks and fractures in oral environments, leading to low integration with the surrounding tissues. Conclusion: PEEK fails to fully meet the physical and mechanical demands required to definitively replace titanium as a dental implant abutment, being a provisional alternative material.
Abstract: Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) is a biocompatible and resistant material that has been proposed as an alternative to titanium for the manufacture of dental implants, but its use in this field is still under development. Objective: To comparatively analyze the physical properties, biocompatibility and clinical performance of PEEK and titanium as materials for dental implants. Methodology: An electronic search of systematic reviews was carried out in the Scopus, Medline/Pubmed, Web of Science and ScienceDirect databases, where the strategy “Polyetheretherketone AND dental implants AND Titanium AND implant abutment” was applied to retrieve published articles in English between the years 2018 to 2023.” Results: The search identified 381 articles of which only 2 met the eligibility criteria, these reviews generally indicating that PEEK has excellent mechanical and chemical attributes, in addition to good thermal stability, being considered a promising tool to be applied in implantology procedures. However, PEEK has reported some drawbacks such as a greater number of microgrooves, leaks and fractures in oral environments, leading to low integration with the surrounding tissues. Conclusion: PEEK fails to fully meet the physical and mechanical demands required to definitively replace titanium as a dental implant abutment, being a provisional alternative material.
Notas
Proyecto de título (Cirujano Dentista)
Palabras clave
Materiales Dentales, Implantes Dentales