Acceptability of HPV Vaccines: A Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Summary
No hay miniatura disponible
Archivos
Fecha
2024-09-23
Profesor/a Guía
Facultad/escuela
Idioma
en
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
Nombre de Curso
Licencia CC
CC BY 4.0 Attribution 4.0 International
Licencia CC
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Resumen
In 2006, the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine was approved for use as an effective intervention for reducing the risk of developing cervical cancer; however, its successful implementation is dependent on acceptability. This study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the reasons that favor or do not favor the acceptability of HPV vaccines. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-summary of qualitative research on 16 databases. A total of 32 articles that considered the perspectives of vaccine users, their parents, and the professionals who care for them were reviewed. Synthesis was conducted as described by Sandelowski and Barroso. Results: We used inductive and deductive methods to obtain a total of 22 dimensions, out of which three issues stood out that should be considered to improve acceptability and are formed by three groups of study, namely, information about the vaccine, fears and side effects, and sexuality associated with the vaccine. Conclusions: Acceptability, as well as adherence to HPV vaccination, is a complex concept. This review highlights the perspectives of the three sets of actors involved in the process (i.e., users, parents, and professionals) and views these factors in relation to acceptability as a guide for new interventions.
Notas
Indexación: Scopus.
Palabras clave
acceptability of healthcare, cervical cancer prevention, papillomavirus vaccines
Citación
Vaccines Open Access Volume 11, Issue 9 September 2023 Article number 1486
DOI
10.3390/vaccines11091486