Influence of Probe Position in the Measurement of Muscle Thickness and its Association with Lean Mass: an Ultrasound Study
No hay miniatura disponible
Archivos
Fecha
2023-04
Profesor/a Guía
Facultad/escuela
Idioma
en
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad de la Frontera
Nombre de Curso
Licencia CC
CC BY-NC 4.0 Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Deed
Licencia CC
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.en
Resumen
Skeletal muscles play a fundamental role in people's lives and their evaluation provides significant information on health. Different tools have been used to evaluate muscle mass, and the evaluation of muscle thickness (MT) using ultrasound has been included as an alternative, which can be performed with the probe in different positions; however, these could present differences. The objectives of this study were to determine whether there are differences in the measurement of MT in the vastus lateralis (VL) muscle using the probe in the longitudinal or transverse position, and to determine its association with the lean mass of the lower limbs. The results indicated no significant differences between MT measurements with the probe in the longitudinal and transverse positions (p =0.084). However, when associating these measurements with lower limb lean mass, it was found that transverse measurements had a strong association (r =0.547; p < 0.001), while longitudinal measurements had a moderate association (r =0.351; p =0.007). This suggests that measurements with the probe positioned transversely to measure the MT would be the best option. Therefore, it could be useful as an indicator of lower limb lean mass in the absence of tools, such as bioelectrical bioimpedance or magnetic nuclear resonance. © 2023, Universidad de la Frontera. All rights reserved.
Notas
Indexación: Scopus
Palabras clave
Arquitectura Muscular, Calidad Muscular, Grosor Muscular, Masa Magra, Muscle Architecture, Muscle Quality, Muscle Thickness, Sarcopenia
Citación
International Journal of Morphology. Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages 640 - 645. Apr 2023
DOI
10.4067/S0717-95022023000200640