Comparative Analysis of Bilateral Deficits in Elbow Flexion Strength: Functional vs. Analytical Assessment
No hay miniatura disponible
Archivos
Fecha
2024-09
Profesor/a Guía
Facultad/escuela
Idioma
en
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
Nombre de Curso
Licencia CC
CC BY 4.0 Attribution 4.0 International
Licencia CC
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Resumen
Background: this study aimed to identify the influence of postural stability on upper-limb bilateral deficit (BLD), and to compare the assessment of strength generated during elbow flexion functionally vs. analytically in the dominant and nondominant arms. Methods: Twenty men participated in two sessions to evaluate the maximum isometric strength of elbow flexion. This evaluation was performed unilaterally with the dominant arm, unilaterally with the non-dominant arm, and bilaterally, both in the sitting position (SiP) and the standing position (StP). Results: The BLD when peak force was considered was lower for StP (−6.44 ± 5.58%) compared to SiP (−10.73 ± 6.17%) (p = 0.007). Regarding peak force, statistically significant differences were observed for comparisons between dominance (p < 0.001) and Position*Dominance (p = 0.02), but mean force differences were only observed for the dominance factor (p < 0.001). Greater mean and peak forces were always produced bilaterally compared to unilaterally (p < 0.001). Conclusions: a decrease in postural stability by performing elbow flexion exercises in a standing position accentuates BLD of peak force.
Notas
Indexación: Scopus.
Palabras clave
bilateral index, isometric contraction, muscle strength dynamometer, neuromuscular
Citación
Applied Sciences (Switzerland) Open Access Volume 14, Issue 17 September 2024 Article number 7808
DOI
10.3390/app14177808